Letter: Acquisition process is broken

Regarding "Report: Contractors should get more oversight"

Let me get this straight. We have a federal acquisition regulation that is thousands of pages long and can be weighed in pounds? There is a defense federal acquisition regulation to shadow and qualify it. We have a vast acquisition corps with thousands of professional overseers. We have a cadre of inspectors general. And we still don't have enough oversight?

What more evidence of a completely broken acquisition line of business do we need? Let's start from square one. Identify the objectives of the law and build only the regulations and oversight we need. Focus on effectiveness, not quantity. Consider vendors as stakeholders in the process.


Anonymous

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • FCW Perspectives
    human machine interface

    Your agency isn’t ready for AI

    To truly take advantage, government must retool both its data and its infrastructure.

  • Cybersecurity
    secure network (bluebay/Shutterstock.com)

    Federal CISO floats potential for new supply chain regs

    The federal government's top IT security chief and canvassed industry for feedback on how to shape new rules of the road for federal acquisition and procurement.

  • People
    DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, shown here at her Nov. 8, 2017, confirmation hearing. DHS Photo by Jetta Disco

    DHS chief Nielsen resigns

    Kirstjen Nielsen, the first Homeland Security secretary with a background in cybersecurity, is being replaced on an acting basis by the Customs and Border Protection chief. Her last day is April 10.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.