Letter: Acquisition process is broken

Regarding "Report: Contractors should get more oversight"

Let me get this straight. We have a federal acquisition regulation that is thousands of pages long and can be weighed in pounds? There is a defense federal acquisition regulation to shadow and qualify it. We have a vast acquisition corps with thousands of professional overseers. We have a cadre of inspectors general. And we still don't have enough oversight?

What more evidence of a completely broken acquisition line of business do we need? Let's start from square one. Identify the objectives of the law and build only the regulations and oversight we need. Focus on effectiveness, not quantity. Consider vendors as stakeholders in the process.


Anonymous

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.