Letter: Acquisition process is broken

Regarding "Report: Contractors should get more oversight"

Let me get this straight. We have a federal acquisition regulation that is thousands of pages long and can be weighed in pounds? There is a defense federal acquisition regulation to shadow and qualify it. We have a vast acquisition corps with thousands of professional overseers. We have a cadre of inspectors general. And we still don't have enough oversight?

What more evidence of a completely broken acquisition line of business do we need? Let's start from square one. Identify the objectives of the law and build only the regulations and oversight we need. Focus on effectiveness, not quantity. Consider vendors as stakeholders in the process.


Anonymous

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to [email protected] (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Defense
    Soldiers from the Old Guard test the second iteration of the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) capability set during an exercise at Fort Belvoir, VA in Fall 2019. Photo by Courtney Bacon

    IVAS and the future of defense acquisition

    The Army’s Integrated Visual Augmentation System has been in the works for years, but the potentially multibillion deal could mark a paradigm shift in how the Defense Department buys and leverages technology.

  • Cybersecurity
    Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas  (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Lora Ratliff)

    Mayorkas announces cyber 'sprints' on ransomware, ICS, workforce

    The Homeland Security secretary announced a series of focused efforts to address issues around ransomware, critical infrastructure and the agency's workforce that will all be launched in the coming weeks.

Stay Connected