GAO: OPM should clarify performance appraisals

Agencies must make meaningful distinctions among senior executives when assessing their performance for pay-for-performance systems to have credibility, the Government Accountability Office said in a report.

Less than a third of senior government managers said bonuses or pay distinctions were meaningfully different among executives, GAO said in a report released Dec. 15. GAO cited an Office of Personnel Management survey of members of the Senior Executive Service (SES).

OPM can ensure that agencies make distinctions in assessing executives’ performance by emphasizing the importance of using a range of rating levels, GAO said.

Agencies can raise the pay caps for SES members if their performance appraisal systems meet certain criteria, including factoring organizational outcomes into the appraisal decisions and making meaningful distinctions in individual performance, the report states. OPM and the Office of Management and Budget must certify that agencies’ performance management systems meet the criteria before they can raise the pay cap, the report states.

Agencies must build safeguards into their performance appraisal and pay systems for senior executives, including conducting higher-level reviews of performance appraisals and communicating the aggregate results with more transparency, the report states.

“Senior executives need to lead the way in transforming their agencies to become more results-oriented, collaborative in nature and customer-focused,” said Robert Goldenkoff, director of strategic issues at GAO.

In the OPM survey, senior executives agreed overwhelmingly that pay should be based on performance, the GAO report states. Therefore, it is important for them to have confidence that the SES performance-based pay system is operating as intended and that they will be rewarded according to their performance, Goldenkoff said.

The agencies that GAO evaluated for its report said OPM should bolster its communications with agencies and executives on how it uses the SES performance appraisal data to determine whether agencies are making meaningful distinctions among executives.

For the report, GAO evaluated performance-based pay systems at the Defense, Energy, State and Treasury Departments; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; and the U.S. Agency for International Development. GAO also reviewed OMB’s oversight and OPM’s guidance.

“Further communication from OPM is important in order for agencies to have a better understanding of how they are being held accountable for these certification criteria and make the necessary improvements to their systems to maintain certification,” Goldenkoff said.

About the Author

Mary Mosquera is a reporter for Federal Computer Week.

Featured

  • FCW PERSPECTIVES
    sensor network (agsandrew/Shutterstock.com)

    Are agencies really ready for EIS?

    The telecom contract has the potential to reinvent IT infrastructure, but finding the bandwidth to take full advantage could prove difficult.

  • People
    Dave Powner, GAO

    Dave Powner audits the state of federal IT

    The GAO director of information technology issues is leaving government after 16 years. On his way out the door, Dave Powner details how far govtech has come in the past two decades and flags the most critical issues he sees facing federal IT leaders.

  • FCW Illustration.  Original Images: Shutterstock, Airbnb

    Should federal contracting be more like Airbnb?

    Steve Kelman believes a lighter touch and a bit more trust could transform today's compliance culture.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.