FCW Forum | E-Government

Bush's legacy is Obama's uncertain mandate

Mark Forman’s early work lives on, but here's what must come next

When Mark Forman packed up his office in August 2003, he promised that the Bush administration would remain fully committed to the e-government component of the President’s Management Agenda. Forman, who left the Office of Management and Budget for a new career at KPMG, had reason to feel possessive about the initiatives. Empowered by the E-Government Act of 2002, he had led the program from its birth through its early stages.

Remarkably, all 24 of the initiatives have survived, despite scant congressional support and small budgets. I found them all still available at their original Web addresses. Portal managers had updated each site at least once in 2008, with the exception of the records management site, which, because of the nature of its content, does not need updating as frequently as the others do.

The fact that the original 24 sites are active and have current information was a pleasant surprise. Many government officials did a remarkable job. Tribute is due to Karen Evans and her staff at OMB, John Sindelar and his staff at the General Services Administration, and the many agency managers who carried on without a lot of support for more than five years.

The success of the e-government initiatives — and the related lines-of-business initiatives that enable agencies to share back-end services — suggests that the government of the future can be one in which agency managers and policy-makers take a holistic view of government.

However, for now, the government continues to be composed of isolated silos. Budgets, legislative authority and congressional oversight committees are all based on individual agencies and departments, not on a broader view of the whole government. In addition, most managers have strong allegiance to their agencies and less to governmentwide goals.

The Obama administration has an opportunity to take a giant step forward. Collaboration and consolidation will save barrels of money while creating a streamlined, integrated government.

How can we get there when there are no organizations and only a few scattered people in government who think in those broad terms? Which people and organizations will help guide agency officials and Congress to the end state? At present, there is a void. But here are some suggestions for President Barack Obama and his team.
  • Create a new position of chief transformation officer at each agency. Staff the positions with capable people who share the goal of creating a government without boundaries and who already know how to make things happen in the government.
  • Create a White House office of federal, state and local government coordination to work collaboratively — not dictatorially — with state and local government officials.
  • Create another White House office to focus on collaborative strategies for the federal government as a whole.
  • Rethink the systems by which agency managers are rewarded so they are encouraged to take a comprehensive view and collaborate governmentwide.
Such an opportunity won’t come again until the next time a new administration arrives. Obama should move quickly to seize it. Once the new team members settle into their jobs, they will become busy with their daily work and have little time to think about taking down the boundaries.

About the Author

McDonough, an independent management consultant, left government in 2003 after a 35-year career in various senior management positions. He can be reached at frank@frankamcdonough.com.

The Fed 100

Save the date for 28th annual Federal 100 Awards Gala.

Featured

  • computer network

    How Einstein changes the way government does business

    The Department of Commerce is revising its confidentiality agreement for statistical data survey respondents to reflect the fact that the Department of Homeland Security could see some of that data if it is captured by the Einstein system.

  • Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. Army photo by Monica King. Jan. 26, 2017.

    Mattis mulls consolidation in IT, cyber

    In a Feb. 17 memo, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told senior leadership to establish teams to look for duplication across the armed services in business operations, including in IT and cybersecurity.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DHS vague on rules for election aid, say states

    State election officials had more questions than answers after a Department of Homeland Security presentation on the designation of election systems as critical U.S. infrastructure.

  • Org Chart Stock Art - Shutterstock

    How the hiring freeze targets millennials

    The government desperately needs younger talent to replace an aging workforce, and experts say that a freeze on hiring doesn't help.

  • Shutterstock image: healthcare digital interface.

    VA moves ahead with homegrown scheduling IT

    The Department of Veterans Affairs will test an internally developed scheduling module at primary care sites nationwide to see if it's ready to service the entire agency.

  • Shutterstock images (honglouwawa & 0beron): Bitcoin image overlay replaced with a dollar sign on a hardware circuit.

    MGT Act poised for a comeback

    After missing in the last Congress, drafters of a bill to encourage cloud adoption are looking for a new plan.

Reader comments

Tue, Feb 17, 2009 Washington DC

Are you kidding? Take a look at OMB's own figures and you will see that eGov saved $400M last year. But establishing eGov offices in all of the federal agencies and the constant barrage of data calls have cost much more than was saved. Despite millions spent on Enterprise Architecture, few if any duplications have been reduced. The only attempt at sharing and collaboration, CORE.Gov, was a complete failure and has pretty much been shut down. The government needs collaboration and reuse but OMB and e-Gov have focused on metrics about work rather than actual work and as a result have accomplished nothing of note. What's more, the manual data call method that OMB uses to gather its information ensures that what they gather is both slow and inaccurate. It is incredible in this day and age to learn that despite all of the technical tools in the world today, OMB is still largely manually driven. All of the information they gather is put into spreadsheets because they lack the basics for effectively aggregating data: a database and the vision to use one. The largest organization in the world and it completely lacks an automated Management Information System? Incredible but true. The legacy that the Bush Administration has left this administration is that their work is cut out for them.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group