House committee establishes acquisition panel

The House Armed Services Committee today established a panel to review the Defense Department’s procurement system. The full committee said the new panel will help write reforms in the next two defense authorization bills.

The Defense Acquisition Reform Panel will consider how to evaluate performance and value in the current acquisition system and the causes of its failures. It also will look at the administrative and cultural pressures that lead to poor acquisition results, the committee said.

The panel, created for six months, will release a report on its findings this fall, the committee said. The report will help guide reform language in the fiscal 2011 defense authorization act. The committee’s leaders expect information from the panel on reform legislation to consider for the fiscal 2010 defense authorization legislation.

Rep. Robert Andrews (D-N.J.) is the panel’s chairman, and Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) is ranking member. The panel also includes Reps. Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.), Brad Ellsworth (D-Ind.), Joe Sestak (D-Pa.), Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) and Mike Coffman (R-Colo.).

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Fri, May 29, 2009 Suspect #1

Having been in acquisitions since 1988 I can tell you that we have always been under scrutiny. Every contract that is let is reveiwed and re-checked many time by several people before release and distribution to the vendor. Once again, someone who wants to make a name for themselves is deciding that Government Contracting is chock full of criminals making illegal deals. I would venture to say that abuses amount to less than 1% of the total number of contracting actions accomplished. OH, and most of them are for the really big bucks. Which have to be approved by congress!

Mon, Mar 9, 2009 Sharon

Another study! Anyone want to lay odds that the findings of this study will be similar if not identical to previous studies and will result in no corrective actions or changes to reduce and clarify the regulations? It's kinda like having a meeting for the sole purpose of planning the next meeting - over and over again.

Mon, Mar 9, 2009 dtp

I hope the panel calls upon and uses the advise of the many formaer military members who are now Federal contractors. These professionals have the unique benefit of having been on bothsides of the fence and in almost all cases have not lost their federal perspective.

Mon, Mar 9, 2009

Amazing. Congress has continually added more and more regulations on how to do acquisitions over the years without thought about how these regulations impact the process. A large part of the administrative pressure is simply trying to wade through layers of regulation that may be well-intentioned, but their impact on the time required for the acquistion process and difficulty in establishing workable procedures to ensure compliance are a nightmare.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group