House again considers electronic records bill

The House is again set to consider legislation that would expand the National Archives and Records Administration’s (NARA) power to dictate how agencies and the White House preserve electronic records. A similar measure cleared the House in the last session, but was not acted on by the Senate.

The bill would amend the Federal Records Act (FRA) and the Presidential Records Act (PRA).

Under current practice, NARA works with an administration to coordinate the transfer of official records on the president’s final day in office. The transfer is mandatory under the PRA, but NARA has no authority over how presidents maintain records during their tenure. Meanwhile, under the FRA, NARA oversees federal agencies’ record-keeping, but its policies do not require agencies to preserve e-mail messages and other electronic records in their native format.

Under the proposed legislation, NARA would require agencies to capture, manage, and preserve records in an electronic format and that agency would develop regulations for how agencies maintain electronic records.

In addition, NARA would have to certify the electronic records management system to be used by a president. The George W. Bush administration’s preservation of its electronic records is the subject of ongoing litigation. In general, the bill would give NARA significantly more power over the Executive Office of the President’s record-keeping practices, and the Bush administration opposed the similar bill that cleared the House last year.

The latest bill cleared the House Government and Oversight Reform Committee by a voice vote March 10. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the measure would cost $156 million between 2010 and 2014.

About the Author

Ben Bain is a reporter for Federal Computer Week.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1986, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

  • Shutterstock image.

    Merged IT modernization bill punts on funding

    A House panel approved a new IT modernization bill that appears poised to pass, but key funding questions are left for appropriators.

  • General Frost

    Army wants cyber capability everywhere

    The Army's cyber director said cyber, electronic warfare and information operations must be integrated into warfighters' doctrine and training.

  • Rising Star 2013

    Meet the 2016 Rising Stars

    FCW honors 30 early-career leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Mon, Nov 2, 2009

Where will the money to pay for this come from??????I know the tax payer will pay but from what account???????

Mon, Mar 16, 2009 Editor

Hi Larry:

Thanks for your feedback. This bill would not change what is considered an agency record under the Federal Records Act, nor would it change what the White House is required to maintain under the Presidential Records Act to adequately document the presidency. In other words, there would still be a difference between what is required of a presidential administration and federal agencies for record keeping. However, in both cases NARA would have new and expanded roles in ensuring electronic records are maintained.

Does that clear things up?

Mon, Mar 16, 2009 Larry West Coast

What this article doesn't make clear is if the SAME requirements would be placed on Federal Records for Agencies that it mentions would be placed on Presidential Records? In the article, it says "...NARA would have to certify the electronic records management system to be used by a president..." so would this be the same for any systems used by Agencies for Federal Records if the Bill passes as written?

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group