Agencies turn to GSA Schedules for T&M contracts

Regulations proving why a time-and-materials contract was the only option weren't applied to Schedules program

The vast majority of commercial services purchased on time-and-materials contracts went through the General Services Administration’s Multiple Award Schedules program, according to a report issued today. But it also said regulations showing that a T&M contract was the only option have not been applied to the program.

Agencies bought $9.1 billion worth of services on T&M contracts from February 2007 to December 2008, the Government Accountability Office said in the report. However, contracting officers could circumvent a Federal Acquisition Regulation’s rule requiring more details on why the officer wasn’t using a type of contract with less risk than a T&M contract.

Under T&M contracts, companies are paid for their time and their materials. The contract type is very risky for the government because costs can grow significantly in a short amount of time.

In 2007, the FAR was revised to allow agencies to use T&M contracts to buy commercial services using a streamlined procurement process. There were safeguards though. One of them required contracting officers to write a detailed determination and findings report to proving why no other contract type was suitable for the purchase.

GSA officials told GAO that the GSA administrator can decide what procedures apply to the program. The program is unique from usual contracts, and legislative language is unclear as to whether the rule requiring contracting officers to justify their decisions to use a T&M contract applies to the Schedules. In a legal opinion, GSA said the Schedules program has other safeguards requiring contracting officers to check that prices are reasonable.

GAO wasn’t convinced though. “It is not apparent to us that the regulations cited by GSA provide the government with risk mitigation equivalent to that provided by” the FAR requirement, it wrote.

However GSA officials said they were working to develop a similar rule that requires contracting officers to show why the T&M contract was the only option.

GAO recommends that regulators amend the regulation to make it clear that the FAR’s safeguard applies to the Schedules program.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Featured

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

  • Cloud
    cloud migration

    DHS cloud push comes with complications

    A pressing data center closure schedule and an ensuing scramble to move applications means that some Homeland Security components might need more than one hop to get to the cloud.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.