DOD may ban Twitter, Facebook, other social media

Security issues prove difficult

The Defense Department is considering banning Twitter, Facebook and other social-networking sites for security reasons.

Wired's Danger Room blog reported that the reason for the latest proposed ban is that the sites may give hackers easy access to military networks.

“The mechanisms for social networking were never designed for security and filtering," said an unnamed source at U.S. Strategic Command in the blog entry. "They make it way too easy for people with bad intentions to push malicious code to unsuspecting users. It’s just a fact of life."

Strategic Command has asked the rest of the military for feedback on a social-media ban, Wired's blog reported.

“The answer is somewhere between” full access and a total bad, said DOD spokesman Bryan Whitman, quoted in a Navy Times article. “We’re working through this challenge of how do we operate in this environment — because these are important communication tools — and at the same time, provide the necessary protection to our systems [and] ensure the necessary operational security and private security concerns that any organization would have.”

The potential ban comes at a time when the DOD has overcome some of its initial reluctance and begun to embrace social media. The Armed Forces Press Services reports that the Army, for just one example, has been using MySpace effectively for recruiting.


The Fed 100

Read the profiles of all this year's winners.


  • Then-presidential candidate Donald Trump at a 2016 campaign event. Image: Shutterstock

    'Buy American' order puts procurement in the spotlight

    Some IT contractors are worried that the "buy American" executive order from President Trump could squeeze key innovators out of the market.

  • OMB chief Mick Mulvaney, shown here in as a member of Congress in 2013. (Photo credit Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

    White House taps old policies for new government makeover

    New guidance from OMB advises agencies to use shared services, GWACs and federal schedules for acquisition, and to leverage IT wherever possible in restructuring plans.

  • Shutterstock image (by Everett Historical): aerial of the Pentagon.

    What DOD's next CIO will have to deal with

    It could be months before the Defense Department has a new CIO, and he or she will face a host of organizational and operational challenges from Day One

  • USAF Gen. John Hyten

    General: Cyber Command needs new platform before NSA split

    U.S. Cyber Command should be elevated to a full combatant command as soon as possible, the head of Strategic Command told Congress, but it cannot be separated from the NSA until it has its own cyber platform.

  • Image from Shutterstock.

    DLA goes virtual

    The Defense Logistics Agency is in the midst of an ambitious campaign to eliminate its IT infrastructure and transition to using exclusively shared, hosted and virtual services.

  • Fed 100 logo

    The 2017 Federal 100

    The women and men who make up this year's Fed 100 are proof positive of what one person can make possibile in federal IT. Read on to learn more about each and every winner's accomplishments.

Reader comments

Wed, Aug 5, 2009 Phil north carolina

How disappointing, as more Generation Y people join the military and civil service in DOD, leaders need to realize this is used everywhere and important as a communication skill. We're going to limit or block them because of security concerns? If they are blocked, we potentially face losing good employees and soldiers/marines/airmen/sailors, but will be completely unprepared for future technology. While we're discussing blocking social networks, why not block everything else (such as FCW) as they clearly have no need to be on DoD networks. Wake up, people.

Tue, Aug 4, 2009 DOD-Detroit Detroit

Wow. I'm amazed that anyone, especially a DOD spokesperson, would think that "Twitter" and "Facebook" are "...important communication tools..." That statement, in the context of the Department of Defense use of it, is absolutely absurd. There's no need for Twitter or Facebook within the DOD. Unless someone can cite specific reasons why either of these two SNSs improve national security, then they have no place on DOD networks.

Tue, Aug 4, 2009 Tom Collins

Wow! This comes shortly after the National Defense University released it's report recommending that DoD "embrace [social media's] responsible usage" and warned that "[f]ailure to adopt these tools may reduce an organization's relative capabilities over time." Among their observations, national security requires extensive DoD participation in social media for both it's rapid communication and listening funcions -- not putting their heads in the sand. Arty Wright's logic is inescapable! And of course, any such "ban" will be about as effective as the ones by Iran and China. Do we want to become them? Only the really important leaks will get out!

Mon, Aug 3, 2009 benbree VA

Ban is a bad word and poor for morale. Banning the sites with no access (via a kisok, separate network, etc) suggests that there is no one in all of DOD who has a working solution that provides access and maintains security. This is simply not true and is embarrassing for someone who served his country. Let's address the issue and move away from silly blanket policies.

Mon, Aug 3, 2009 tera hawaii

Social Media is still at risk, whether Gov is using it or not. Those who produce those websites (Facebook, mySpace, etc) are ALSO exposing all of their CUSTOMERS, and should be doing everything that they can, as a provider, to minimize risk and prevent or reduce intrusion. Wouldn't that, in turn, place Gov, as a customer, at less risk??

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group