Business groups want Congress to address E-Verify concerns

TechAmerica and others ask lawmakers to deal with their worries about E-Verify

This article was updated at 7:15 p.m., Aug. 11, 2009, to explain that the letter given to reporters was a draft and clarify the groups’ position on E-Verify requirements for contractors.

Trade associations that include TechAmerica and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce say Congress should deal with worries they have about the E-Verify employment eligibility verification system.

The language of provisions in the Senate bill to fund the Homeland Security Department for fiscal 2010 doesn’t address concerns that employers have about the E-Verify system, the associations said in a draft of a letter dated today and given to reporters.

The Senate version of the bill would require all federal contractors to enroll in E-Verify and require the system be used to re-verify current workers. The House version of the bill does not have that provision. The groups plan to send a letter to the chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees.

The organizations said:

  • Mandatory verification should be limited only to newly hired employees.
  • Contractors should be protected against having to assume excess liability for their subcontractors.
  • Exceptions should be made for contracts that don’t meet a certain threshold for expense and length of performance.
  • States and localities shouldn’t be allowed to put in place different requirements on federal contractors that use E-Verify.

Jennifer Kerber, TechAmerica’s vice president for federal and homeland security policy, said her organization supports an online, workable employment verification system. However, Kerber said, “We have concerns with the scalability of the system. We have concerns that right now I can bring you someone else’s document and be employed whether that’s me or not.”

Kerber said her organization was also concerned about the level of liability that contractors face with the system.

Critics of E-Verify say errors in government databases can cause an unacceptable rate of incorrect results.

According to the latest statistics from DHS, 96.9 percent of cases queried through the system automatically authorized employees for work, and 3.1 percent showed a mismatch or a tentative non-confirmation. Then 0.3 percent of the total number of candidates had successfully contested an adverse initial decision about their eligibility, while the other 2.8 percent remained ineligible.

DHS runs the Web-based system in partnership with the Social Security Administration. About 134,000 employers use E-Verify, and 12 states mandate its use for state workers, contractors or both.

The Obama administration has said it will require companies use the system on contracts won after Sept. 8 to verify employees hired during the contract term and to confirm the eligibility of current employees who do contract work for the federal government in the United States. However, there are exemptions for existing contractor employees not working on federal contracts, and contracts under a certain dollar threshold under the rule.

About the Author

Ben Bain is a reporter for Federal Computer Week.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.