OMB falls short on data, GAO says

OMB has not included subcontracting award data on and has no specific plan for collecting such data.

The Web site has been live for more than two years so the public can see where its tax dollars are going, but the site’s data has not been complete nor accurate, according to a new report. went live Dec.13, 2007--a month earlier than the legislated deadline. It's a Web site compiling a comprehensive list of the more than $1 trillion in financial assistance awarded through contracts, loans and grants. Congress mandated such a site in its Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), which became law in September 2006.

Since the Office of Management and Budget launched the site, OMB has fallen short of several of program requirements, the Government Accountability Office reported March 12.

Related stories:

Federal spending database defies doubters

IBM to integrate federal acquisition databases

Coburn questions OMB's delays on data

First, OMB has not included subcontracting award data on, which was required as of January 2009, nor does OMB have a specific plan in place for collecting and reporting such data, according to GAO’s report.

Second, OMB has yet to report to Congress on the use of the site. However, OMB officials told GAO they are collecting the necessary information and plan to issue the report this year.

While is supposed to give the public a complete view of government spending, nine of the 29 agencies required to submit information on federal assistance awards did not file a total of 15 awards, GAO reported. More importantly, OMB has no way to identify agencies that don’t report their award data as the law requires, according to the report.

“Without a more effective approach to ensuring that all agencies report applicable awards, the utility of will be impaired by gaps in the required information,” GAO wrote.

Data problems already linger among the information included on In a random sample of 100 awards, GAO found numerous inconsistencies between data and records provided by agencies. Each of the 100 awards had at least one required data field that was blank or inconsistent with agency records. Some of the agencies’ own records lacked sufficient information to even evaluate their consistency with data on, GAO reported. The most common data fields with inconsistencies or omissions included titles describing the purpose of the award and the city where award-funded work was to be performed, according to the report.

To improve the data, OMB’s E-Government Portfolio Manager told GAO that OMB plans to create an online data quality dashboard of agency submissions to improve the completeness of award data. The manager also said the Open Government Directive would help with the reporting and the quality of the data.

OMB plans to issue additional guidance on agency data plans, internal controls over data quality and a longer-term strategy for federal spending transparency, the manager told GAO. OMB also plans to improve the transparency of federal award data, such as launching an improved version of the site this year.

“If OMB takes these steps as planned and effectively implements them, it could help improve the overall quality of federal spending data,” GAO wrote.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.


  • Workforce
    Shutterstock image 1658927440 By Deliris masks in office coronavirus covid19

    White House orders federal contractors vaccinated by Dec. 8

    New COVID-19 guidance directs federal contractors and subcontractors to make sure their employees are vaccinated — the latest in a series of new vaccine requirements the White House has been rolling out in recent weeks.

  • FCW Perspectives
    remote workers (elenabsl/

    Post-pandemic IT leadership

    The rush to maximum telework did more than showcase the importance of IT -- it also forced them to rethink their own operations.

Stay Connected