OMB falls short on data, GAO says

OMB has not included subcontracting award data on and has no specific plan for collecting such data.

The Web site has been live for more than two years so the public can see where its tax dollars are going, but the site’s data has not been complete nor accurate, according to a new report. went live Dec.13, 2007--a month earlier than the legislated deadline. It's a Web site compiling a comprehensive list of the more than $1 trillion in financial assistance awarded through contracts, loans and grants. Congress mandated such a site in its Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), which became law in September 2006.

Since the Office of Management and Budget launched the site, OMB has fallen short of several of program requirements, the Government Accountability Office reported March 12.

Related stories:

Federal spending database defies doubters

IBM to integrate federal acquisition databases

Coburn questions OMB's delays on data

First, OMB has not included subcontracting award data on, which was required as of January 2009, nor does OMB have a specific plan in place for collecting and reporting such data, according to GAO’s report.

Second, OMB has yet to report to Congress on the use of the site. However, OMB officials told GAO they are collecting the necessary information and plan to issue the report this year.

While is supposed to give the public a complete view of government spending, nine of the 29 agencies required to submit information on federal assistance awards did not file a total of 15 awards, GAO reported. More importantly, OMB has no way to identify agencies that don’t report their award data as the law requires, according to the report.

“Without a more effective approach to ensuring that all agencies report applicable awards, the utility of will be impaired by gaps in the required information,” GAO wrote.

Data problems already linger among the information included on In a random sample of 100 awards, GAO found numerous inconsistencies between data and records provided by agencies. Each of the 100 awards had at least one required data field that was blank or inconsistent with agency records. Some of the agencies’ own records lacked sufficient information to even evaluate their consistency with data on, GAO reported. The most common data fields with inconsistencies or omissions included titles describing the purpose of the award and the city where award-funded work was to be performed, according to the report.

To improve the data, OMB’s E-Government Portfolio Manager told GAO that OMB plans to create an online data quality dashboard of agency submissions to improve the completeness of award data. The manager also said the Open Government Directive would help with the reporting and the quality of the data.

OMB plans to issue additional guidance on agency data plans, internal controls over data quality and a longer-term strategy for federal spending transparency, the manager told GAO. OMB also plans to improve the transparency of federal award data, such as launching an improved version of the site this year.

“If OMB takes these steps as planned and effectively implements them, it could help improve the overall quality of federal spending data,” GAO wrote.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Shutterstock image: looking for code.

    How DOD embraced bug bounties -- and how your agency can, too

    Hack the Pentagon proved to Defense Department officials that outside hackers can be assets, not adversaries.

  • Shutterstock image: cyber defense.

    Why PPD-41 is evolutionary, not revolutionary

    Government cybersecurity officials say the presidential policy directive codifies cyber incident response protocols but doesn't radically change what's been in practice in recent years.

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

Reader comments

Wed, Aug 24, 2011 Justin United States

I know these things can take a while but any followup from OMB or GAO on closing these remaining gaps?

Tue, Mar 16, 2010

This transparency if a great idea. When will Congress make transparent their pork barrel spending for the American public can see???

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group