Senate aims to tighten reins on government IT spending

Bill calls for more planning and evaluation of IT projects

The Senate has passed a bill that would put tighter controls around the money the government invests in its major information technology projects.

The Information Technology Investment Oversight Enhancement and Waste Prevention Act (S. 920) would set up tougher monitoring of the roughly $80 billion that agencies spend each year on IT.

The Government Accountability Office reported in October 2009 that it had identified 11 mismanaged IT investments made by agencies that will likely cost $3 billion more than planned.


Related stories

HUD CIO seeks help with IT investment system

Senate IT oversight bill progresses


The bill would establish an improved process for agencies to manage the progress of their IT projects. It would require more planning and oversight before agencies invest their money into the projects. And once they've begun, agencies would have to measure the progress to verify whether it’s matching the expected costs and schedule and meeting performance targets, the bill states.

If a project goes bad, the bill would require agencies to notify the Office of Management and Budget as well as Congress, and they may have to end projects that fail to meet their targets.

“It’s clear that federal agencies are dropping the ball when it comes to deploying the right technology in a timely and cost-effective manner,” said Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), who sponsored the bill, along with Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine).

The legislation developed from a series of hearings of the Federal Financial Management Subcommittee, which Carper chairs. The hearings found agencies were poorly managing costly and risky IT investments. One high-profile investment gone awry was the Census’s malfunctioning hand-held devices that collect the data. The bad machines forced the officials to revert to paper-based system.

The Senate's bill now goes to the House for its consideration.

 

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1996, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

  • Shutterstock image.

    Merged IT modernization bill punts on funding

    A House panel approved a new IT modernization bill that appears poised to pass, but key funding questions are left for appropriators.

  • General Frost

    Army wants cyber capability everywhere

    The Army's cyber director said cyber, electronic warfare and information operations must be integrated into warfighters' doctrine and training.

  • Rising Star 2013

    Meet the 2016 Rising Stars

    FCW honors 30 early-career leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Mon, May 24, 2010

Another government oxymoron. A law to regulate over spending in the IT world with projects gone bad? Most interesting. Some projects gone bad by up to 3 billion dollars worth eh? How much will it cost us to make sure we save that money? I would bet it will cost far more than 3 billion dollars in administrative costs and lost production costs. That's the oxymoron that I see in this.

Fri, May 21, 2010 Steve Chantilly

Three words for the clowns on the Hill: Federal Enterprise Architecture. Does every agency needs its own everything? No. Does every Air Force Base need it own applications? No! Does every agency need it own IT IDIQ? No. Will Congress cut with grace? No.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group