Pay freeze idea gets chilly reception

Obama receives strong objections to pay freeze proposal from labor unions, questions of fairness from congressional leaders.

President Barack Obama today proposed freezing the pay of federal employees for two years.

“I’ve asked the civilian servants to do what they’ve always done: play their part,” Obama said in a press conference.

The freeze must be approved by Congress, and it would affect civilian employees’ pay in fiscal 2011 and 2012.

Obama and his officials expect the freeze to save $2 billion for the remainder of fiscal 2011. The government may save as much as $3 billion in 2012. Looking further down the road, Obama’s proposal might save as much as $28 billion during the next five years and more than $60 billion during the next decade, based on current savings trends.

Related stories:

Cost-cutters target fed workers again

Debt commission aims at feds' pay, benefits

"The hard truth is that getting this deficit under control is going to require broad sacrifice. And that sacrifice must be shared by the employees of the federal government," Obama said.

The president said he did not arrive at his decision easily.

“This is not a line item on a federal ledger. These are people’s lives,” he said.

The freeze would apply to all civilian federal employees, including those in various alternative pay plans and those working at the Defense Department. However, military personnel will not be affected by the freeze, the president said.

The reactions to Obama's announcement were mixed. Steny Hoyer, the House majority leader, supported Obama’s decision, although he said the president would find greater savings by freezing the pay of both civilian employees and military personnel, except those in war zones overseas.

There has been parity between civilian and military pay raises for 22 of the past 28 years in which raises were authorized, and hundreds of thousands of federal civilian employees work alongside military employees in DOD and other agencies, he said.

“It would have added an element of fairness,” he said in a statement.

The National Treasury Employees Union disagreed overall with Obama’s move and said it would work with members of Congress to overturn the decision.

“NTEU is mindful of our nation’s economic circumstances, but we are very disappointed with the White House’s position and intend to explore all of our options,” NTEU President Colleen Kelley said.

Kelley said she was concerned about the ability for agencies to hire new employees because there would be no pay raises until at least 2013.

“Our government needs to be able to hire and keep talented and skilled employees, and worsening federal pay will make that much more difficult,” she said.

However, Jeffrey Zients, federal chief performance officer and deputy director for management at the Office of Management and Budget, was sure agencies still could attract highly skill employees. People come to work for the government for more than pay, he said.

“The freeze will not get in the way of bringing in talented people,” Zients said, seeking to reassure those who worry about the overall capabilities of the federal workforce and current difficulties in recruiting new employees.

Hoyer said he planned to review Obama’s proposal "for its balance between fiscal responsibility and the need to recruit and retain a federal workforce able to provide the level of service that the American people expect."

Obama made the announcement today based on a legal deadline to submit information on pay to Congress, officials said. It is not directly tied to possible proposals from the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (popularly known as the Debt Commission) on ways to save the government money, Zients said.

John Gage, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, called the administration's decision a "panicked reaction" to the commission and nothing more than political public relations.

Overall, the freeze is a part of Obama’s Accountable Government Initiative to cut costs, save money and do more with less in the federal government. The president has already frozen pay increases for senior White House officials. He suggested approximately $20 billion in terminations and reductions in more than 120 programs. The administration has also been making efforts to reduce the amount of money the government spends improperly.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Mon, Jan 3, 2011

I took a 25% pay cut to become a federal employee and this is a slap in the face. How about the President going after Congressional Pay, Senate Pay, and Postal Pay? I am sure my rent, utilities and other expenses will not be frozen for the next two years. This is absolutely unfair unless it is done across the board and also freeze all other costs, like fuel, food, rent. I am sure that civilian companies will not see their pay frozen.

Mon, Jan 3, 2011 Todd WV

"The hard truth is that getting this deficit under control is going to require broad sacrifice. And that sacrifice must be shared by the employees of the federal government," Obama said.
The president said he did not arrive at his decision easily.

Does someone need to remind Obama the reason the deficit is so high. Why should we have to pay for his mistakes!

Thu, Dec 23, 2010

While there is a pay freeze, what happens when each year rent and cost of living rises?

Thu, Dec 16, 2010


Fri, Dec 3, 2010

This freeze will affect more than the government employees involved. This economic crisis had made many of us the only stable wage-earners in our extended families, and we have been instrumental in keeping our families afloat. I voted for Obama because I believed he was above the political games, but this is an obvious knuckling under for political gain. We've been thrown under the bus because he wants to gain political capital he can spend elsewhere.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group