Google wins: Interior forbidden to award noncompetitive contract to Microsoft

Court finds Interior excluded rival too early

The Interior Department can't  award a noncompetitive contract to Microsoft, a federal judge has ruled. 

U.S. Federal Claims Court Judge Susan Braden ruled on Jan. 3 that negotiations for a sole source contract with Microsoft “commenced many months prior to July 15, 2010,” when department officials decided Microsoft's software was their standard for e-mail and computer operating systems. Meanwhile, Google had been trying to get considered for the work as well.

The contract is a first step in establishing a framework that could result in the department adding more than 80,000 e-mail mailboxes as well as other messaging and collaboration services.

Despite limiting the competition, Interior officials knew Google had the means to do the work and was interested in competing for it, the judge held. By July 22, Interior officials were aware that Google had a government-only version of the Google Apps software and claimed it had obtained the necessary information security certifications, according to the court's decision filed Jan. 4.

“Interior violated the Competition in Contracting Act and relevant [Federal Acquisition Regulation] provisions and that such violation was prejudicial to Google’s interests,” Braden wrote.

Google sued last October, asking for a preliminary injunction on awarding a contract. The company has been frustrated several times in its efforts to compete against Microsoft for cloud offerings.

Braden added that there was no wrongdoing on Microsoft's part, but actions that “show only competitive zeal and interest in customer satisfaction.”

Interior officials declined to comment because the litigation is ongoing. 
 

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

The Fed 100

Save the date for 28th annual Federal 100 Awards Gala.

Featured

  • computer network

    How Einstein changes the way government does business

    The Department of Commerce is revising its confidentiality agreement for statistical data survey respondents to reflect the fact that the Department of Homeland Security could see some of that data if it is captured by the Einstein system.

  • Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. Army photo by Monica King. Jan. 26, 2017.

    Mattis mulls consolidation in IT, cyber

    In a Feb. 17 memo, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told senior leadership to establish teams to look for duplication across the armed services in business operations, including in IT and cybersecurity.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DHS vague on rules for election aid, say states

    State election officials had more questions than answers after a Department of Homeland Security presentation on the designation of election systems as critical U.S. infrastructure.

  • Org Chart Stock Art - Shutterstock

    How the hiring freeze targets millennials

    The government desperately needs younger talent to replace an aging workforce, and experts say that a freeze on hiring doesn't help.

  • Shutterstock image: healthcare digital interface.

    VA moves ahead with homegrown scheduling IT

    The Department of Veterans Affairs will test an internally developed scheduling module at primary care sites nationwide to see if it's ready to service the entire agency.

  • Shutterstock images (honglouwawa & 0beron): Bitcoin image overlay replaced with a dollar sign on a hardware circuit.

    MGT Act poised for a comeback

    After missing in the last Congress, drafters of a bill to encourage cloud adoption are looking for a new plan.

Reader comments

Wed, May 11, 2011 DoD Insider

Time for Google to challenge the sole source Microsoft Email Cloud implemented of DISA/Army that has failed miserably. With only 10k users, the systems is performing horribly and missing all estimated performance estimates developed by Gartner and Mitre. Time to question DoD's decision making process as they begin to revamp IT Acquisition.

Fri, Jan 7, 2011

I think the title and article distorts what the case presented. The Court of Federal Claims essentially ruled that the Agency did not follow FAR requirements in presenting their Sole Source Justifications. They did not have a CO sign the documents and or they did not have the correct approving officials sign off as required by the FAR due to the dollar amount of the contract. The Court expressly stated it did not question or consider the agency’s judgment. In all likelihood if the Justification for Sole Source was followed according to the law Google would have lost (and they still may lose the contract).

Thu, Jan 6, 2011 Washington, DC

Well, I wonder what this will do to USDA's recent award to Microsoft? Google NOW has grounds to appeal that award too...YAH!!!!

Thu, Jan 6, 2011

GOOGLE ROCKS!!!

Thu, Jan 6, 2011 Gboluwaga USA

I agree with the decision of the judge. Although I love Microsoft products, but by having competition, Microsoft will be able to improve the quality of their products.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group