House rejects freeze of merit-based pay increases

By a wide margin, the House on Feb. 19 rejected a measure that would have extended the federal pay freeze to merit-based pay increases. It would have jeopardized step increases for hundreds of thousands of federal employees paid under the General Schedule pay system.

The measure, Amendment No. 569 by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., was rejected 191-230 when it was offered as part of H.R. 1, the bill to fund the government after the expiration of the continuing resolution on March 4. The funding bill, which cuts about $60 billion in discretionary spending from current agency levels, eventually did pass on a 235 -189 party line vote, with all Democrats and three Republicans opposing the measure.

The ultimate fate of H.R. 1 remains uncertain. President Obama has threatened to veto the House bill, and Senate Democrats have begun drafting their own CR, which includes Obama’s proposal to freeze spending for five years. With both chambers in recess this week for the Presidents Day recess, it not known whether there will be enough time to craft a budget compromise before the deadline. Such a failure could result in a shutdown of the federal government, which hasn’t occurred since 1996.

To see more, got to http://thomas.loc.gov.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.