SBA changes anti-suspension, debarment culture, IG says
Some officials believe enforcement foils their agency's mission
- By Matthew Weigelt
- Mar 03, 2011
The Small Business Administration earned slightly better marks today from its inspector general, who has been pushing the agency to get tough on crime.
In the past, many SBA officials believed suspending or even debarring a small business that scams the government out of contracts was anathema to the agency’s mission, Peggy Gustafson, SBA’s IG, told the Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee.
Some officials "are terrified at the thought of suspensions and debarments,” she said. “I was kind of amazed at that.”
By suspending a company, officials believed they might be denying it access to the contracts it needed to survive, said Gustafson, who’s been IG since October 2009.
GTSI-SBA agreement puts company under the microscope
SBA shifts from Ra-Ra-Ra to No! No! No!
SBA leader vows to crack down on small-business fraud
However, other small businesses suffer as a result of fraud, she said.
SBA officials’ views are changing, albeit slowly. “It’s a big battleship to turn,” she said.
Last October, SBA suspended GTSI and two other contractors that were
involved in pass-through contracts issued by the Homeland Security
Department. The suspension rattled the IT contracting community.
Industry experts were taken aback by SBA’s decision because the move was
SBA lifted the suspension a month later when the company agreed to some
tough stipulations. Among other actions, SBA demanded that several
senior officials resign, including CEO Scott Friedlander.
Suspension and debarment protect taxpayers’ money, and SBA has to use
that authority as a precondition to pursuing a conviction and proving
fraud beyond a shadow of a doubt, Gustafson said.
In 2010, SBA Administrator Karen Mills told the House Small Business
Committee that her agency was becoming more aggressive in combating
fraud in its business development program.
Although attitudes are gradually changing, Gustafson said, SBA has
avoided establishing a strong suspension and debarment program of the
type her office proposed last year. Officials applied parts of the
proposal, such as training employees, but little more, she added.
“In particular, SBA has not yet issued a notice to its employees
emphasizing the importance of identifying and pursuing suspension and
debarment,” Gustafson said in written testimony.
Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.