NARA's spending plan for electronic archive isn't reliable, GAO says

Latest report shows continued weaknesses in managing Electronic Records Archives

The National Archives and Records Administration's plan for spending $86 million to finish the current phase of its troubled Electronic Records Archives is unreliable and incomplete, according to a new report.

The Government Accountability Office report said problems continue to grow for the ERA program. Previous GAO reports have detailed major schedule delays and cost overruns, and the Office of Management and Budget said new development for the digital archive would end by Sept. 30.

In October 2010, NARA submitted a fiscal 2011 expenditure plan to support its request for $86 million for the project, according to the latest GAO report.

However, GAO auditors determined that although the plan satisfies four of the six conditions requested by Congress, it does not provide a reliable basis for spending the additional funds.

Related stories:

NARA's costs soared for digital archive, GAO says

NARA's digital archive falters as others soar

“Specifically, NARA’s plan does not clearly show what functions have been delivered to date or how actual costs compare to planned costs,” GAO auditors wrote. “Further, even though NARA plans to end development in fiscal year 2011, the fiscal year 2011 expenditure plan does not clearly show what functionality is planned to be delivered, by when, and at what cost during this period.”

In addition, NARA’s cost estimates are shaky because of weaknesses in the supporting methodology, including too much reliance on contractor estimates and untraceable and unvalidated data, GAO auditors said.

Finally, NARA did not include a plan to guide spending of $20 million in accumulated multi-year funds for the project dating from fiscal 2010. The agency needs to specify how it will use those funds before lawmakers can evaluate the fiscal 2011 request, GAO auditors said.

The report is the latest in a series of critical assessments of the 10-year-old program. NARA awarded a contract to Lockheed Martin in 2005 to provide a permanent archive for digitized official records, with initial operating capability achieved in December 2008. The ERA project was originally projected to cost about $500 million, but GAO said recently the cost could rise as high as $1.4 billion.

“With significant weaknesses in many basic oversight and management processes, as well as continued delays in completing Increment 3, NARA’s ability to make significant development progress in the remainder of the fiscal year will be challenged,” GAO auditors wrote. “With OMB's direction to stop development after 2011, it is unclear whether NARA will be able to effectively address the full range of weaknesses we identified and still have adequate time to complete significant development efforts.”

GAO suggested that Congress consider limiting NARA’s ability to use appropriated funds for ERA until officials implement an adequate capital planning and investment control process.

GAO made the following recommendations to NARA:

  • Report to Congress on the specific outcomes to be achieved with the $20 million balance in multi-year funding in fiscal 2011.
  • Ensure that the ERA requirements planned for fiscal 2011 are fully prioritized.
  • Ensure that significant changes to the project's cost, schedule and scope are approved through NARA’s review process.
  • Conduct post-implementation reviews to validate estimated benefits and costs.
  • Submit expenditure plans to OMB for review and approval before submitting them to Congress.
  • Update the ERA Requirements Management Plan and related guidance to mandate prioritization of requirements throughout the project’s life cycle.

NARA officials agreed with the recommendations. However, they noted that the last four recommendations apply only to future-year funding for the project and not to fiscal 2011.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

The Fed 100

Read the profiles of all this year's winners.


  • Then-presidential candidate Donald Trump at a 2016 campaign event. Image: Shutterstock

    'Buy American' order puts procurement in the spotlight

    Some IT contractors are worried that the "buy American" executive order from President Trump could squeeze key innovators out of the market.

  • OMB chief Mick Mulvaney, shown here in as a member of Congress in 2013. (Photo credit Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

    White House taps old policies for new government makeover

    New guidance from OMB advises agencies to use shared services, GWACs and federal schedules for acquisition, and to leverage IT wherever possible in restructuring plans.

  • Shutterstock image (by Everett Historical): aerial of the Pentagon.

    What DOD's next CIO will have to deal with

    It could be months before the Defense Department has a new CIO, and he or she will face a host of organizational and operational challenges from Day One

  • USAF Gen. John Hyten

    General: Cyber Command needs new platform before NSA split

    U.S. Cyber Command should be elevated to a full combatant command as soon as possible, the head of Strategic Command told Congress, but it cannot be separated from the NSA until it has its own cyber platform.

  • Image from Shutterstock.

    DLA goes virtual

    The Defense Logistics Agency is in the midst of an ambitious campaign to eliminate its IT infrastructure and transition to using exclusively shared, hosted and virtual services.

  • Fed 100 logo

    The 2017 Federal 100

    The women and men who make up this year's Fed 100 are proof positive of what one person can make possibile in federal IT. Read on to learn more about each and every winner's accomplishments.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group