2012 budget with 3-year pay freeze passes House

Republicans fire first salvo in fiscal 2012 budget battle

The House has passed a Republican-sponsored fiscal 2012 budget resolution that includes measures to freeze federal pay through 2015 and reduce the federal workforce an estimated 10 percent by 2014.

The bill (H. Con. Res. 34), which passed on April 15 by a vote of 235 – 193, would trim back the civilian federal workforce through attrition by allowing agencies to hire only one employee for every three who leave federal employment.

In addition to extending the current federal civilian pay freeze, the bill also would require feds to contribute more to the defined benefit they receive at retirement.

The bill’s supporters claim the budget, dubbed “Path to Prosperity,” will trim more than $6 trillion from federal spending over the next 10 years. The author of the bill, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), called the vote “our generation’s defining moment.”

President Barack Obama has proposed a different approach, blending spending cuts with tax increases -- Ryan's budget proposal lowers top tax rates -- and Democracts have criticized the Ryan proposal's changes and cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, among other provisions. The Senate has not yet taken up either propsal. However, the government could be heading toward another standoff and shutdown threat as the 2012 budget process begins in earnest.

The House adjourned shortly after the vote for a recess, and will reconvene on May 2.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Thu, May 19, 2011 jeff

i see the republican plan to freeze federal pay for five years as a means to circumvent President Obama's directive to reduce the cost of services contracts. This is a direct threat to in-sourcing, and will in turn force the federal government to rely on contractor support. DoD already pays more for services contracts that it spends on weapons systems!

Wed, Apr 20, 2011 Dr. Tom Lawton/Fort Sill

As I see it if Congress decides to freeze and allow not only annual pay increases and no step increases then we need a new Congress. We also need to reevaluate their salaries and benefits. The cuts that need to be made are at the top rung as well as well as the bottom rung. Regards Dr. Tom

Wed, Apr 20, 2011

Congress truly loves throwing around their weight. They pass legislation and bills impacting most everyone else but themselves and their owners (be it big business/corporations or unions). I'd truly love to see congress apply their bills to themselves and lead by example. The want to reduce agency budgets to the 2008 level; them first. They want to reduce the federal payroll by 10%; how many staffers do they need and would a 10% reduction in congressional staff be such a loss? For federal employees there are 'performance improvement plans - PIPs' for low performing employees - is it time to set up PIPs for Congress? I think beyond working with the media to divert everyone's attention from their failings; we may see a repeat of their inability to show adult behaviors, leadership or compromise. Maybe I'm wrong; time will tell.

Tue, Apr 19, 2011

As a Federal worker in the Health Care system, I can tell you that we are losing good people to outside jobs simply because the pay has NOT kept up with industry standards. As our pay was frozen our health benefits rose by 8% or more. The average cola for medical centers in my area last year 4%. If we can't get and keep qualified people, that justs puts more stress on the health care for our vets and active duty personnel.

Tue, Apr 19, 2011

Government officials advocate increased efficiency in contract acquisitions through the use of incentives. They do not practice what they preach. Instead of 1) incentivizing their workers to find efficiecies and to save funding, or 2) revamping the budget process which encourages wasteful spending, they flat line the salary and COLA of the very workers who could be saving many times their COLA or salary. Further, the workforce cuts will make daily work burdensone to those left behind to 'do more with less'. this does not reflect innovating thinking.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group