Army enterprise e-mail move proceeds apace, DISA says

The program remains on schedule and on budget, despite some obstacles, officials say

Defense Department officials said May 3 the Army enterprise e-mail project is on budget and moving forward as planned, despite obstacles that have cropped up along the way.

“We are hitting our budget targets. We are on budget for [migrating] NIPR and we’re on track to do the same for SIPR,” said Maj. Gen. Ronnie Hawkins, vice director of the Defense Information Systems Agency, referring to the military’s non-classified and classified networks (respectively). DISA is working in conjunction with the Army to create an enterprisewide e-mail program for the Army, which it will host.

Related coverage:

Army enterprise e-mail initiative tackles tough challenges

Army execs chat progress of budget and acquisition reforms

In a joint DISA and Army conference call, Mike Krieger, deputy Army CIO/G-6, estimated the costs to break down to roughly $52 per user – a figure higher than the $39-per-user price projected last year by former Army CIO/G-6 Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Sorenson, but significantly less than the previous $100-per-user cost for e-mail service.

Krieger added that the costs vary per user based on user needs – for example, a Web-only account would be less expensive than a NIPR account, which would be less expensive than a SIPR account.

“We considered doing an RFP, but DISA gave us a really good deal,” Krieger said. “We prepaid DISA for fiscal 2011, and there is a line item in the budget for fiscal 2012,” which he expects the Army will not exceed. The total cost for 2011 was $52 million, Krieger added.

To date, Army enterprise e-mail currently has 12,000 users and is planned to encompass more than 900,000 users by December, Krieger said.

Hawkins and Krieger acknowledged there have been struggles along the way, including some issues with the migration tool being used to move Army e-mail accounts to the DISA cloud that houses the enterprise e-mail service.

“We’ve made a lot of refinements, and Microsoft and the service center had to do some patches. We have to refine our [tactics, techniques and procedures], but we’re at the point where we’re at 95 percent successes at night,” Krieger said.

The e-mail account migrations are being done overnight, with the goal to be moving 1,000 accounts per night. Krieger said that the 1,000-account goal has been validated, but it’s not yet being done every night.

“We’re finalizing the ‘when’ [of reaching the 1,000-account goal] this week,” Krieger said. “We’re hoping to turn the spigot on in the next few weeks.”

Hawkins also noted some problems with standardization in the migration process.

“The tool is working, but sometimes people aren’t doing what they’re supposed to be doing to be standardizing to use the tool,” Hawkins said.

Another problem is the existence of multiple e-mail accounts for some users, Krieger said.

The e-mail service is designed to be used across DOD, but so far, the Army is the only one of the services to implement enterprise e-mail. It’s not clear when – or if – the Air Force, Navy and Marines will also use the service, and all eyes are on the Army to gauge how well the initiative works.

“Whether other services join [enterprise e-mail] depends on the side of the street you’re on,” Hawkins said. “For DISA, it’s a matter of when. For the other services, it’s an if. The other services are looking to see how successful this will go ... and that’s something we’re aware of.”

If the other services opt not to join enterprise e-mail, it would present a problem for DOD users moving jobs between the services, such as from the Army where an enterprise e-mail account is being used to another service that doesn’t use the program.

“That’s a scenario we’ll have to work through,” Krieger said.

When all is said and done, the enterprise e-mail system will include a global address list with more than 3.9 million users, the ability to share calendars across DOD and essentially unlimited storage, Krieger noted.

“This is a concrete example of the Army moving a core function – e-mail – to the DOD private cloud. This is our increment of the federal data center consolidation mandate,” he said.

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

Cyber. Covered.

Government Cyber Insider tracks the technologies, policies, threats and emerging solutions that shape the cybersecurity landscape.


Reader comments

Tue, Feb 26, 2013

Talking wastful spending --why they are tryong to fix something that hasn't broke in the first place. This is just another "Ass-Kissing" Gen trying to impress the boss --making up the $ that don't make any sence, this is why private company ALWAYS ahead fo the game when it comes to technology

Fri, Jan 25, 2013

Well well well, here we are nearly two years later. I cannot use "enterprise email" because it is completely unreliable, I cannot use AKO (which equally sucked - but worked) because you closed it off, and I cannot use civilian email systems, because I am transmitting FOUO and PII. Wonder what the cost/user is when it doesn't work... (Can you guess why I'm ranting right now? Here, from Korea... Thanks!)

Mon, Dec 5, 2011

Another great folly is the support that comes with this new "Enterprise Email". Good luck finding out how to fix an email account duplication, and cannot find a way into your account. You change an entire system but offer no end user support, great management.

Thu, Dec 1, 2011 DoD Insider

A recent claim by Mr. Krieger, G6 Deputy CIO, that the Army saved $100Million will surely raise eyes on the hill since nothing has been turned off to justify any such savings, and the number of email Clouds at DISA has blossomed to 7! It is not a Cloud if you have to have multiple instances to make it work. Those on the inside tell DoD Insider that the market research was a sham, developed by Gartner, after Microsoft paid them almost a 1/2 Million. Neither SUN nor Google were contacted to support the study, thus confirming that Microsoft wrote the report and Gartner only cashed the check.

Mon, Aug 8, 2011 James S. Sullivan Kosovo

The numbers here just don't add up. If the Army is going to move 1000 accounts per night for a total of 900,000, it will take over 2.5 years to complete this. Secondly, why will there only be 900,000 when open sources put the Army population at over 1,300,000 including Guard, Reserve, and civilian? Lastly, if the cost is $52 million for less than a full year of service for fewer than 1 million users, where does the $52 per user (per year, I assume) cost come from?

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group