Administration's use of interim rules upsets industry

Business groups are questioning the Obama administration’s frequent use of interim rules that put regulations into effect before the final language is settled. That means that companies can spend money to comply only to have the requirements change again.

“We believe that the ever increasing reliance upon the use of an interim rule violates the spirit of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, at a minimum, and misuses the ‘urgent and compelling’ exception,” said a letter from the Council on Defense and Space Industry Associations.

The letter was sent to the Defense Department’s defense procurement and acquisition policy office May 26 and six business groups signed it. A source close to the council said leaders are drafting a similar letter for the Office of Federal Procurement Policy.

The Federal Acquisition Regulations allow for officials to set up a rule immediately. The council complained to DOD that many times interim rules are not under "urgent and compelling circumstances" to warrant such an action, and regulators sometimes don’t give a reason for why a rule needs to go into effect immediately.

However, the council said the pressure to implement often isn’t there. For example, a statutory deadline does not put a proposed regulation under any pressing circumstances in most cases, it said.

The council pointed to a recent case that amends the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement regarding companies’ business systems for accounting, purchasing, and other areas. The regulation clarifies policies about the definition and administration of the systems used to help with DOD auditors’ oversight. (Read the regulation.)

The rule was published May 18 and immediately took effect.

The rule on business systems has been issued twice under different proposals. Now the fiscal 2011 National Defense Authorization Act requires more revisions to business systems regulations.

The council contended the cost of compliance goes up if a rule goes into effect immediately and then is changed. The government often pays more in the end, and the contractor has to deal with more risk.

“The nature of the change imposed on the procurement system by a new regulation should be given more weight,” the letter states.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity
    malware detection (Alexander Yakimov/Shutterstock.com)

    Microsoft targets copycat influence websites

    Microsoft went to court to take down websites it believes to be part of a foreign intelligence operation targeting conservative think tanks and the U.S. Senate.

  • Cybersecurity
    secure network

    FAA explores shifting its network to FISMA high

    The Federal Aviation Administration is exploring an upgrade to the information security categorization of IT systems as part of air traffic control modernization.

  • Cybersecurity
    Shutterstock photo id 669226093 By Gorodenkoff

    The disinformation game

    The federal government is poised to bring new tools and strategies to bear in the fight against foreign-backed online disinformation campaigns, but how and when they choose to act could have ramifications on the U.S. political ecosystem.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.