Agencies play it safe with contract types

The federal government pulled away from awarding risky time-and-materials contracts and turned to cost-reimbursement contracts more often in fiscal 2009 compared with 2010, according to a new report.

In 2009, agencies awarded $31.31 billion in time-and-materials contracts, or 6 percent of the government’s $554.5 billion in spending. In 2010, they awarded $28.41 billion, or 5 percent of the $535.8 billion in federal spending, according to a report from the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP), which was released July 11.

Meanwhile, cost-reimbursement contracts climbed from $163.1 billion, or 29 percent, in 2009 to $162.2 billion, or 30 percent. Read the report.

Related stories:

New procurement rules put limitations on cost-reimbursement

Creative contracting means better contracts

OFPP Administrator Dan Gordon said the increase came as agencies decreased their use of time-and-materials contracts, a point driven home by the Obama administration. Agencies still were caught in situations where a contract’s requirements had enough uncertainty to prevent officials from negotiating a contract with a fixed price.

“Some increase in spending through cost-reimbursement contracting was expected,” he wrote in the report.

A cost-reimbursement contract holds less risk for the government than the time-and-materials contract, Gordon wrote.

Under cost-reimbursement contracts, companies are reimbursed based on allowable costs instead of the delivery of a completed product or service.

Time-and-materials contracts provide for acquiring supplies or services on the basis of direct labor hours at a set rate. The rate includes wages, overhead, general and administrative expenses, and profit. It also includes the actual cost for materials. This has been the least favored type of contract for some time because it doesn’t give contractors an incentive to control costs.

The most favored contract type, the fixed-price contract, stayed generally steady over the past two years. According to the report’s figures, 63 percent of federal spending in 2009 was awarded through fixed-price contracts, and 62 percent in 2010.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Thu, Jul 14, 2011 A Contractor

RE @what?!? BRAVO!!!

Wed, Jul 13, 2011 What?!?

Look, the USG is responsible for controlling the USG's cost - not contractors. Get good managers that understand the project and then stick to planned schedules and features. USG creates most cost overruns through scope bloat, inability to make decisions, and change requests driven by office politics. None of the contract types is inherently more cost effective - stop the misinformation and focus on good USG PMs.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group