Internal struggles further muddy future of AKO

At one time, the idea of an enterprise e-mail program that would link the entire Defense Department and enable better collaboration sounded like a good idea — so good that it could replace similar capabilities already in existence, including the multipurpose Army Knowledge Online portal, which offers e-mail, chat, messaging and directory services, and its spinoff, Defense Knowledge Online.

Theoretically, it still is a good idea. With DOD facing major budget cuts and imposing efficiency mandates, it would make sense to opt for a system that improves collaboration and saves hundreds of millions of dollars.

But there are problems, including the ongoing struggles within the enterprise e-mail project and confusion about its relationship to AKO. Contradictory statements from officials make it unclear whether enterprise e-mail will replace AKO or be yet another redundant capability it’s designed to eradicate.

“I’m confident that the Army leadership knows what they are trying to do with DOD enterprise e-mail, and replacing AKO might be the right thing to do,” said Gary Winkler, former Army program executive officer for enterprise information systems and founder of Cyber Solutions and Services. "But it is the most difficult of any type of acquisition program there is, and odds of success are low. The theory is good, but making reality of the theory will be extremely difficult and painful.”

The Army’s path ahead for AKO and enterprise e-mail — and the relationship between the two — is quite muddled at the moment. Conflicting comments about the future of AKO exacerbate confusion even within the internal ranks.

“No one really knows what’s going to happen with AKO,” said one source close to the situation. Although it would seem that the shutdown of DKO means AKO's days are numbered, “no one is saying much. I think it’s something that’s still being worked out at the highest levels. There’s a lot of uncertainty.”

In a July 24 Army Times article, deputy CIO Mike Krieger denied that AKO would be closed down and said a Federal Computer Week report that AKO’s funding would be shifted to enterprise e-mail was “not an accurate characterization.”

But a June 21 internal Army memo signed by CIO Lt. Gen. Susan Lawrence said exactly that.

“CIO/G-6 Enterprise Initiatives will decrement AKO funding in order to resource enterprise e-mail and collaboration capabilities,” the memo states. It goes on to detail plans for reducing AKO’s funding from $70 million in fiscal 2012 to no more than $20 million in fiscal 2017.

Kenneth Frietzsche, AKO/DKO product director, clarified that AKO would probably be modified and possibly stripped down to basic services for use by Army retirees and family members. “It’s likely that AKO will be different but not completely go away,” he said.

What might go away are some of the capabilities provided by AKO, though it isn’t clear which ones. According to a Defense Information Systems Agency official, requirements for military communications have changed, and some capabilities simply aren’t part of the military’s way ahead — something that was factored into the decision to shut down DKO.

“The world has changed over the past five years, and as we look at the functionality, there’s only a subset of capabilities that is part of our way ahead,” said Col. Brian Hermann, chief of enterprise application services in DISA's Program Executive Office for Global Information Grid Enterprise Services.

In place of DKO, DISA is launching an Enterprise Services Portal Branch, which will focus on three core departmentwide requirements: file sharing, access to other enterprise services and a storefront/marketplace for mobile applications.

It’s possible that DKO’s closure and replacement with the Enterprise Services Portal Branch could be a good indicator of what’s to come for AKO and the future of enterprise services like the ones AKO provides — namely, a tandem, DISA-led effort that combines enterprise e-mail and the new portal effort to provide the services that are needed the most.

But Winkler warns that no one should expect such a transition to be easy or painless.

“Ernie Gregory, formerly the deputy assistant secretary of the Army for financial management and comptroller, told me over 10 years ago that any program whose name begins with a D (for Defense) or J (for Joint) is always fraught with problems because of their multilayered complexities," Winkler said. "He was speaking from experience, and my experience has been the same.”

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

  • Shutterstock image.

    Merged IT modernization bill punts on funding

    A House panel approved a new IT modernization bill that appears poised to pass, but key funding questions are left for appropriators.

  • General Frost

    Army wants cyber capability everywhere

    The Army's cyber director said cyber, electronic warfare and information operations must be integrated into warfighters' doctrine and training.

  • Rising Star 2013

    Meet the 2016 Rising Stars

    FCW honors 30 early-career leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Wed, Aug 10, 2011

Lesse- AKO/DKO replacement, NMCI replacement, whatever USAF is building, DLA's unified email and collaboration projects. Here's an idea- how aout one system for everyone, or at least multiple iterations of the same software suite? Should reduce R&D costs by at least half, I would thing.

Wed, Aug 10, 2011 Shirley Washington DC

Why is the Army considering funding another enterprise solution instead of using the money to build up the current enterprise tool? The Army already has an enterprise collaboration system and its called Army Knowledge Online. The start up cost of implementing EE is already over budget. Is the Army really saving money? The cost per user on EE is more expensive than the cost per user on AKO. Will the price of EE get cheaper as additional email users are added? I don't think so. Again, why not make improvements to AKO? The current financial situation calls for making fiscal decisions that will trim the fat and make the Army lean and the decision to develop and introduce a new enterprise system is a waste of money.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group