Protective Services risk assessment system fails, GAO says

The Federal Protective Service’s new risk assessment information system is millions of dollars over budget, two years behind schedule and despite corrective efforts is not functional, according to a new report from the Government Accountability Office.

Three years ago, the service funded the Risk Assessment and Management Program (RAMP), which was expected to cost $21 million, with delivery by July 31, 2009.

Now the cost of RAMP has soared to $57 million and the system isn't  operating effectively, the GAO said in a report published on Aug. 15.

“RAMP is over budget, behind schedule, and cannot be used to complete Facility Security Assessments and reliable guard inspections as intended,” the report said.

Related story:

Union: Contractors weaken Federal Protective Service

Until the service makes improvements in its project management of RAMP, “it risks repeating some of the same mistakes it made during the last four years, which have resulted in significant expenditures on a risk assessment and management system that is not functional,” GAO concluded.

As of June 2011, $35 million had been spent on developing RAMP, the report said. Costs increased partly because the service made changes in original system requirements, and the contractor accommodated the changes.

Aside from the cost and scheduling problems, the new system also does not work effectively because the agency did not verify the accuracy of the federal facility data it contains, and there is no edit function that allows inspectors to edit the data when necessary.

The system also lacks a process to verify training and certification for 13,200 contract guards at federal facilities, and does not incorporate certain security standards dating from April 2010, GAO continued.

GAO recommended that the Homeland Security Department and director of the protective service evaluate the cost and benefits of continuing with RAMP, or whether an alternative would be more effective.

GAO also recommended increasing the use of project management best practices; establishing a process for verifying the accuracy of federal facility and guard certification and training data before entering the data into RAMP; and developing an interim solution for completing security assessments while RAMP’s problems are fixed.

DHS officials agreed with the recommendations.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Thu, Aug 18, 2011 gary

FPS HQ's all need to be terminated but what do they do? The promote the fools to SES positions and what. The only way to fix FPS is to totally disband it and start over. HQ MUST be staffed with experienced law enforcement people NOT military folks that have no idea on what they are doing. OH ya and thank you gary for ramp you worthless piece of $hit....

Tue, Aug 16, 2011

Until FPS's upper management gets a complete overhaul there will be no change. Legislature is attempting to fix the problem but without propper leadership there can be no hope. The agency just promoted them to S.E.S. Postions.

Tue, Aug 16, 2011

Absolute incompetence! The project manager and upper management should be held accountable and all fired. There obviously are a lot of folks not being diligent and doing their jobs. No excuse for these results. And DOD is an even bigger joke!

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group