Global Open Government Partnership gets mixed forecasts

As the United States prepares to co-launch a global partnership for government transparency, advocates weigh in with suggestions for priorities while critics warn of risks.

Senior government officials from the United States and Brazil, the co-chairing countries, will officially start the Open Government Partnership at a United Nations event Sept. 20. Each of the eight countries that are initial partners is expected to unveil an open-government plan. More countries are thought to be seeking membership.

The partnership has drawn increasing attention, with transparency being touted as a way to reduce corruption, increase trust in government and lower costs. The partnership seeks to support a broad range of innovative practices offered by governments around the world.

“For the U.S. as well as the other participants, the Open Government Partnership has been an impetus to action for transparency,” wrote Gavin Baker, federal information policy analyst at OMB Watch, in a blog entry posted Sept. 1. “The national plan to be released in September is an important opportunity for the [Obama] administration to expand on its progress in strengthening open government in order to empower Americans and build a better democracy.”


Related story:

Clinton kicks off open-government partnership


OMB Watch submitted suggestions for the forthcoming plan, which included improving federal websites and Data.gov with common data formats and identifiers, strengthening records management, and increasing disclosure.

Meanwhile, there's been some pushback. Andrea Di Maio, a vice president at Gartner Research, said the countries involved are at different levels in terms of their open-government priorities, making common goals unclear.

“Even looking at the two co-chairs — U.S. and Brazil — differences are striking in terms of pace of growth, level of development, attitude toward IT sourcing,” Di Maio wrote in a Sept. 6 blog entry.

He also warned against the global partnership being used to advance vendor or country agendas.

The risk “is that leading countries tend to showcase their approaches, which are almost automatically taken as best practices,” Di Maio wrote. “But what is a best practice for a federal agency in the U.S. or a large city in the U.K. may be either irrelevant or even counterproductive in a place like Moldova or Albania, just to name two.”

Also, some of the pressure to adopt open-government practices is coming from technology vendors for commercial reasons, he added.

“Of course, it is early to say whether and how the joint governance mechanism in the Open Government Partnership will prevent such risks, but it is important for all participants to be acutely aware of those,” he said.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.