Agencies don't account for all program costs, experts say

The government is trying to operate like a business, but unlike most private-sector firms, some service providers can’t be sure what to charge their customers, experts said.

Auditors at the Government Accountability Office said several agencies with interagency contracts and those that help other agencies with acquisitions don’t carefully account for all the costs of their programs, according to a report released Sept. 12.

For example, the General Services Administration doesn’t account for the costs of each contract in its Networx multi-agency contract (MAC), a major telecommunications service offering for federal customers. GSA officials told GAO that they track the total direct and indirect costs of operations for Networx only as part of a larger program because it’s jointly managed with the long-distance services program. Similarly, the Interior Department doesn’t assign its overhead costs proportionately between its offices in Arizona and Virginia.

Yet, tracking and identifying costs is a key element in deciding what to charge customers, GAO said.

“Therefore, these agencies cannot ensure that all their fee rates are set appropriately and may be missing opportunities to identify program inefficiencies,” wrote William Woods, director of acquisition and sourcing management at GAO.

Businesses need precision and accuracy to operate as well as possible, said Ray Bjorklund, senior vice president and chief knowledge officer at FedSources.

“If you don’t know your costs, then you don’t know how well you’re doing or what price to charge your customers,” he added.

The process of managing and setting fee rates for interagency contracts involves balancing the costs of operating the program and the revenues needed to cover those costs, Woods wrote.

GSA, Interior, NASA’s Solutions for Enterprisewide Procurement (SEWP) program, and the National Institutes of Health have fee-based MACs and assistance services. Their fee rates for the selected interagency contract programs range from 0.25 percent to 12 percent of the value of the order for fiscal 2011. They also vary depending on the level of service and type of acquisition services provided.

Fees have remained stable since fiscal 2007 at four of the six programs GAO reviewed — three at GSA and one at Interior. Two programs — one at NASA and one at NIH — lowered their rates.

Through the years, agencies have used those MACs and other services. Sales totaled nearly $49 billion for the selected programs in fiscal 2010. However, only half of the six programs increased in sales volume since 2007. The largest percentage increase in sales was NASA’s SEWP, which grew from $997 million in 2007 to $2.4 billion in 2010 — a 137.4 percent increase, the report states.

On the other side, the largest decrease was in the NIH governmentwide acquisition contact program. Its sales decreased from $914 million in 2007 to $756 million in 2010, a 17.4 percent decline, the report states.

In these tough budgetary times, agency officials considering whether to use MACs or get help with their acquisitions will likely look for more details about where their money is going.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group