Is Congress loyal to federal employees?

The administration’s top procurement policy official has warned senators their loyalty to federal employees will soon be challenged.

The coming demand to reduce federal spending will show whether senators approach the issue thoughtfully or haphazardly, said Dan Gordon, administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy, speaking to Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii) in a hearing Sept. 20.

“There are those, who, I think, in a myopic way focus on reducing the size of the federal government and what they really mean is reducing the size of the federal workforce,” Gordon said. "Your vigilance in thinking about, and preserving, the appropriate balance between work done by federal employees and by contractors, I think, will be tested." 

Related story:

Workforce largely spared in first super committee session

Gordon testified before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee’s Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia Subcommittee. Akaka is the panel's chairman.

Gordon said arbitrary cuts that may happen across government will force agency officials to revert back to a heavy reliance on private-sector companies to help their agencies carry out their missions.

Federal officials would have to hand out work, “in an unjustified and unthoughtful way, to contractors to do work that, upon reflection, the agencies recognize should be done by a federal employee,” he said.

In August, Gordon released a policy letter on the meaning of the term inherently governmental functions, or work that only federal employees should be doing, such as setting federal policy or doing interrogations for the government. The letter gives agency officials the definition of inherently governmental work. It also gives managers tests for deciding whether their employees themselves have the enough knowledge about certain work and are able to oversee a contractor doing jobs that are critical to the agency meeting its mission successfully.

Congress and the Obama administration are going through agencies looking for cuts and savings. The bipartisan Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction has orders to trim $1.5 trillion from the federal budget during the next decade. Its proposed cuts are due by Nov. 23. President Barack Obama announced his proposals Sept. 19.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Shutterstock image: looking for code.

    How DOD embraced bug bounties -- and how your agency can, too

    Hack the Pentagon proved to Defense Department officials that outside hackers can be assets, not adversaries.

  • Shutterstock image: cyber defense.

    Why PPD-41 is evolutionary, not revolutionary

    Government cybersecurity officials say the presidential policy directive codifies cyber incident response protocols but doesn't radically change what's been in practice in recent years.

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

Reader comments

Tue, Oct 18, 2011

Why not simply cut the C*&^ and go ahead and Contract out every position within the Administrative Branch that is not listed in the Purple Book. Then Congress would only have to worry about their contractual services budget. We all know there and many that would jump at this as the long term profits would be there after the recovery. No one in there right mind would go to work for the Government now anyway so it the best choice for everyone.

Thu, Sep 22, 2011

Reset the FY2012 budget to the FY2006 level - prior to the massive increases by the progrressives, and both the deficit and the debt problems will suddenly become more manageable. Agencies will have to rescope their goals and objectives, but that is what executives and managers should be doing.

Wed, Sep 21, 2011 Mark DC

Congress's first loyalty is to the Constitution. After that comes the American people as a whole and to the states/districts they represent. There's no room for loyalty to unions, companies, big donors, PACs or federal employees. Each Senator and Representative should keep one eye on the Constitution and one on their constituents. Both eyes are thusly accounted for.

Wed, Sep 21, 2011

Cut unnecessary, ineffective, and redundant programs, reduce overlapping authorities, reduce unneeded oversight. Stop the "earmarking" by whatever term is being used today by Congress. The you can adjust the size of the total workforce to the remaining, agreed upon, functions of the government. Managing by Federal FTE count is just plain ignorant. Always has been, always will be.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group