VanRoekel quickens pace on data center closures

Federal CIO Steven VanRoekel has quickened the pace on the governments data center consolidation efforts, and simultaneously broadened the field.

Agencies are now to look at almost any facility that includes servers, even wiring closets of as little as 100 square feet, as a candidate for consolidation and closure, he said in a conference call. Previously, the assessment of data centers focused on facilities of 500 square feet and larger.

VanRoekel said the government now hopes to shutter 472 facilities by year’s end and 962 by 2015. Previously, the Office of Management Budget set goals of shuttering 373 data centers by the end of 2011 and 800 by 2015, with a goal of saving $3 billion annually. Agencies published their latest plans for consolidation on CIO.gov on Oct. 7.


Related coverage:

Do consolidation and cloud always kill jobs?

Kundra heralds 'golden source' of data center savings coming soon

 


The government has closed 81 data centers to date and now envisions saving $630 million in the near term with the current consolidation plans and $5 billion savings in the years beyond 2015, VanRoekel said.

Agencies will post data center consolidation plans online on Oct. 7. A more comprehensive agency-to-agency breakdown will be available at the end of the year, VanRoekel said.

OMB has also launched a new data center cost model “to drive an apples-to-apples comparison on the way agencies budget and drive behavior on closing data centers,” VanRoekel said. The cost model will give OMB and CIOs across agencies the tools to compare with other agencies whether they are doing the right things to close data centers.

When VanRoekel became federal CIO, he saw a lot of inconsistencies in both the way agencies were managing their closure planning and data center optimization. Working with the Data Center Consolidation Initiative Task Force, which has 24 agency members, a tool was created that can more effectively help agencies manage and budget for data center optimization and closures, VanRoekel said.

About the Author

Rutrell Yasin is is a freelance technology writer for GCN.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Tue, Oct 11, 2011 CheckLogic DC

yeah... we consolidated... moved our equipment from our leased space (which we still have to pay for) to another agency that charges us more than what we paid at the previous place... consolidation = yes; savings = NO

Tue, Oct 11, 2011

Other than maybe a little electricity, how does closing a data center in a govt-owned building save the taxpayers a dime? (Note I said taxpayers, not agency budgets. The money paid from one agency to another for 'rent' never really existed.) What is the payback period for these forklift moves or virtualization projects, especially for legacy systems with less than 5 years expected remaining lifespan? I'm strongly in favor of consolidated data centers, but it has to be done sensibly. From what I have seen of the current project so far (from down on the bottom), this is a stunt so they can say they 'did something', and the costs are irrelevant.

Tue, Oct 11, 2011 DonC BWI

I am amazed at how closing data centers will make us more efficient. It seems akin to closing your shooting your business foot off. How can agencies survive without data centers? CIO UR expecting too much from PCs. Maybe if you had worked at a federal data center you would see that. Consoladate yes, close no. Stupid idea.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group