OPM slows access to USAJobs to lighten load

The worst of the problems that have plagued the revamped USAJobs federal job search website may be easing a bit, as government authorities have stepped up their response in recent hours.

But many users continue to report problems with USAJobs.gov 3.0 since its launch last week, and job search experts and legal advisers suggest that job applicants may wish to try out alternative measures while the difficulties are addressed.

Some of the latest problems users experienced were deliberate measures that the Office of Personnel Management took to lighten the demand on the system. After the user complaints began to flood the USAJobs Facebook page and elsewhere, OPM installed a gatekeeper application to reduce traffic congestion, said Angela Bailey, chief human capital officer at OPM.

Recent USAJobs coverage:

OPM says USAJobs fixed, but complaints continue

OPM blames high demand for USAJobs complaints

USAJobs.gov still struggling, but may be improving

USAJobs.gov 3.0 reboot getting fail reviews from users

The application blocks 6 percent of users from accessing the site on the first try, said Bailey, who described the application in a Facebook posting on Oct. 18. It accounts for the users who report getting messages saying the site is too busy and urging them to try again later.

“We put a ‘governor’ on the site to help slow down the traffic coming in the front door,” Bailey wrote. “You can think of it like the lines installed at your favorite amusement park...they don't let everyone rush the front door of their favorite ride, they slow you down by having you go through turnstiles, etc. This is what we are doing for about 6 percent of you.”

She outlined additional steps, including the installation of additional search servers and additional capacity for the system, to reduce traffic congestion. The new servers were put in last week, are being tested and will be fully functional in several days, she added.

Bailey also suggested that users hit the “Refresh” button on their browser, or the F5 function key, to improve performance of the website.

Leigh Moore, a federal job search consultant in Atlanta, Georgia, said most of her job-hunting clients have been upset by their inability to use the redesigned USAJobs website since it was introduced on Oct. 11.

“People say they cannot access the system,” Moore said in an interview on Oct. 18. “There have been timeouts, errors and confusion. It has been very frustrating for most people knowing they cannot trust the technology.” She has been advising job hunters to try searching for jobs on federal agency websites as an alternative to USAJobs.gov in the interim.

Errors and downtime at the USAJobs website are “definitely a big problem, especially in this economy,” added John Mahoney, partner in the Tully, Rinckey law firm in Washington. He is advising several options to job seekers to deal with the situation as well.

Meanwhile, federal job search experts have been suggesting alternatives to search for jobs, such as using federal agency websites directly, major search engines Google or Yahoo, job search aggregation sites such as AvueCentral.com or Indeed.com, and social media networks that mention job openings such as LinkedIn.

“Do not assume that every federal job is listed on USAJobs.gov,” suggested Moore. “If you want to find a job at the Centers for Disease Control, you could go to the CDC website directly.”

Linda Rix, co-chief executive of Avue Technologies Inc., which handles job listings for some federal agencies, said many federal jobs can be searched directly from Avue’s site or from Google, MSN, AOL or Yahoo.

“Given the options, there is no reason to be completely despondent,” Rix said. “For most of the jobs that are posted on agency websites, Google will pick them up.”

As for legal options, federal job applicants may want to consider some possibilities if they believe they were negatively affected by the USAJobs.gov technical problems, Mahoney said.

First, he suggested that applicants contact agencies directly and apply by mail with paper applications if necessary. He also suggested trying alternative websites and contacting congressional representatives to bring attention to the issue.

Applicants would not be advised to sue the federal government for mistakes made in handling a job application, unless there is indication that the problem was intentional or discriminatory, Mahoney added.

On the other hand, many federal agencies have a grievance process that can be utilized by job applicants who believe they were negatively affected by technical glitches in the application process, Mahoney suggested.

Acknowledging that such grievances can be “a touchy issue” and may require professional legal assistance, Mahoney said that some frustrated job applicants might benefit by writing directly to an agency official describing the problem and requesting remedial action.

“A letter of complaint is technically a grievance,” he said.

OPM debuted the new USAJobs on Oct. 11, following 18 months of development of the system. Previously, the job listing and search system was housed on Monster.com’s computers under a contract, but now it is hosted by OPM’s own servers.

The launch has been plagued from the first moments of operation with thousands of user reports of problems, including inaccessibility of the website, failed or inconsistent searches, disappearing data and inexplicable timeouts and error messages. A third-party tester reported failure rates of 55 percent to 73 percent during a two-day period in the initial week of operation.

OPM officials blamed the problems on record high traffic running three to five times higher than peak days. On Oct. 14, an OPM official announced that the site was operating properly and third-party testing on Oct. 15 showed failure rates of between two percent and 25 percent.

However, user complaints on the USAJobs.gov Facebook page began spiking again two days later, and an OPM official confirmed that there were still difficulties.

“As with any project of this size, there are still technical issues that we are working to resolve,” the OPM spokeswoman said in a statement on Oct. 17. “While most applicants are currently able to find and apply for jobs, full service has not yet been restored.”

Top priorities to be addressed included increasing the number of applicants who can use the website at one time, reducing errors in search results, and reducing negative impacts from high traffic, the statement said.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

Cyber. Covered.

Government Cyber Insider tracks the technologies, policies, threats and emerging solutions that shape the cybersecurity landscape.


Reader comments

Tue, Jul 14, 2015

I worked in the office for a total, when combined, of 10 years while military, and 5 years while a contractor doing the exact job posted. This was the rare occurrence when one of the civilian positions in that office was open. The persons responsible for filling the DoD civilian position were watching for my application to get through the required USAJOBS. It was not referred, so they had no way of selecting me. I have applied to many positions, and only been referred once, for a job I only had minor experience with (never called for an interview, but I am not surprised). Many jobs were entry or lower level which included responsibilities that were minor, but regular parts of my 22 year military career. No referrals on those. The persons responsible for the initial review and filtering of the applications and resumes have no clue what they are looking at, zero understanding, and no qualifications to review the resumes, for technical oriented positions. These are the people that are choosing who gets a chance at a job. Not only does it seem that they have no understanding of the job requirements or information in the resumes, but it also seems like they have contempt for those with military experience.

Mon, Dec 22, 2014

I am a 10 point veteran with a 4 year degree. Despite having applied to over 20 jobs on USAJOBS since summer 2014, I have only received ONE notice that I was actually referred to a hiring manager. And wouldn't you know it, I never got contacted for an interview, but instead received an email a few weeks later saying that someone else had been chosen for the position. This was for the Department of Veterans Affairs position in Mountain View, California. But it isn't only the VA who is against hiring vets, all other federal agencies I applied for gave me the old middle finger as well. Having worked for the Postal Service for a number of years, and also speaking to vets in other agencies and in my own research online, I can safely say that there is a strong anti-veteran sentiment in federal agencies. Unless you know someone personally in charge of hiring, then your chances are almost nill of getting one of these positions. You may have better luck if you're a minority or lazy bum who has never served the country.

Tue, Jan 22, 2013

I've recieved many "ineligible" email notifications because my qualifications exceed the minimum requirements that are listed for the jobs i have applied for. If i exceed the minimum,shouldn't i be more likely to get a job? I can only conclude that i must meet only the minimum requirements or i just simply need to "know" someone.

Thu, Mar 8, 2012

The VA in Dublin,GA seems to be overlooking VETERANS and participating in the age old good old boy system. Cronyism is the politically correct term used now. I and many other VETERAN'S are passed over while civilians receive most jobs

Wed, Nov 16, 2011

The DLA analyst positions that are supposed to be open, never are. I have applied multiple times and cannot get consideration. Many times, I find that I am not able to complete the appliction process. The applicaion process is: 1)1-boring; 2-has too many time outs between pages; 3- when you hit refresh, you see the screencome up with a message that :you need to resend information over an unsecure link - are you sure you want to do this?"

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group