Air Force urged to move to social-media style communications

As the Air Force prepares to bring in its next generation of airmen, the service faces a new kind of service member: the digital native raised in a culture of broadcasting information of all kinds. That gulf between the new generation and the digital-immigrant Air Force makeup until now must be reconciled in order to operate in today’s theater, according to a top Air Force official speaking Oct. 21 at an AFCEA event in Vienna, Va.

It’s a matter of moving from traditional, one-on-one telephone-style contact to the mass approach of today’s social media.

“Marconi to Google – that’s Ma Bell to Facebook. The Marconi is a radio, and it was a great way to communicate one human at a time. But you can step on each other or delay the information exchange requirement maneuvers,” said Brig. Gen. Bob Ranck, director of warfighter systems integration, Air Force CIO/A6. “If you’re moving to Google or Facebook then you’re sharing with a broader audience with a greater information exchange requirement.”

Like exchanges on Facebook – but with decidedly greater implications – communications between airmen and aircraft need to be broadcast and then distributed as necessary by those receiving the info.

“Unfortunately we design individual aircraft to communicate with individual aircraft and individual populations. It’s a Ma Bell mentality. It’s not a network…it’s only one information exchange requirement at a time,” Ranck said. “We ought to be designing a network so that information is not passed from one person to another, but published and subscribed. When you publish and subscribe the information, the guys that need it can pick it up and can do the individual call if they need to.”

Ranck said that within his directorate, they are working to overcome the cultural barriers between the two generations – and the traditional Air Force methods of communications built on archaic requirements and realities.

“Fast forward to the director of warfighting systems integration [office], with one foot in the obsolete world, and one foot in the IT world, recognizing that I’m a digital immigrant and the people I’m building requirements for…are people who expect more than second-generation communications in a fifth-generation aircraft,” he said.

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Mon, Oct 24, 2011 RayW

Am I missing something? This article implies that the so called "social media" is the requirement to make information available to all. I thought that was the premise of the internet thirty plus years ago? Unfortunately, in the name of security, many things are locked down with expiring passwords and obtuse links. The reasons for this are the friendly folks in Bulgaria (are they still active?), China, N. Korea, the Middle East (both 'good' and 'bad' guys), Russia, and even domestic folks who want to find out what (insert favorite organizations/companies) are doing for gain or pain.

Now this author seems to think that all the pain we have can be avoided by using broadcast 'social' media (even though they seem to equate the existing subscription systems to point to point, yet talk about subscribing anyway). Heck, even the old "point to point" system he disparages is vulnerable to espionage. If that is still true, then how much more data will someone be able to gather with a broadcast system?

And personally, I do not have the time to filter what I get now, having to filter a true broadcast with the chaotic postings that many 'younger' folks seem to think is 'cool' (even my 19 year old says there is a lot of garbage, even in focused 'friends' groups) seems to be requiring more time, and I refuse to be tethered 24/7 like many fast track folks seem to expect, I have other interests, hobbies, and tasks that help keep my sanity.

This is my opinion, based upon too many years of using the net and seeing issues and not that of my boss, my boss's bosss, the pentagon, congress, or the prez.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group