COMMENTARY

Why can't the government manage its workforce?

The past year was not one for easy resolutions. The year began with talk of a government shutdown and/or a furlough for federal workers. Neither transpired, but the underlying budget impasse remains unresolved, with the recent failure of the supercommittee to agree on budget reductions serving as additional evidence that our political process is broken.

But the budget battles have also raised two troubling questions about the state of government operations that, in light of the need for spending cuts, cannot be ignored for long.

1. Why can’t the federal government manage its workforce? At several points throughout the year, lawmakers entertained the idea of cutting the federal workforce, by as much as 20 percent in one case. So far, no proposal has gotten any traction. One reason is that lawmakers and federal officials alike have no clear sense of where they would begin cutting. Perhaps the workforce is too big, perhaps not. But the more fundamental problem is that the distribution and composition of the workforce are not well-aligned with the missions of federal agencies. That needs to change, whether cuts are made or not.

2. Do agencies grasp the importance of their contractors? The Obama administration has made a concerted effort to better define — and limit — the role of contractor personnel. Without a doubt, that is a much-needed course correction. But federal officials often talk as if the use of contractors was discretionary, and that often isn’t true. The federal hiring process, however much it might have improved, makes it difficult for agencies to hire people with the skills they need in a timely fashion. As long as that’s the case, contract employees will be essential to the day-to-day work of many agencies — even if that work isn’t classified as a critical function. Like it or not, it’s a blended workforce and it must be managed as such.

Until the Obama administration gets a handle on those two issues, any efforts to “rightsize” the government have little chance of succeeding.

John Monroe
Editor-in-Chief
Federal Computer Week

About the Author

John Monroe is Senior Events Editor for the 1105 Public Sector Media Group, where he is responsible for overseeing the development of content for print and online content, as well as events. John has more than 20 years of experience covering the information technology field. Most recently he served as Editor-in-Chief of Federal Computer Week. Previously, he served as editor of three sister publications: civic.com, which covered the state and local government IT market, Government Health IT, and Defense Systems.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.