Plain language in federal regulation comes closer

Federal regulations can be a maze to navigate, but the federal government this week took further steps to streamlining jargon in an effort to make rules more accessible to citizens.

Writing on the OMBlog, Cass Sunstein, administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, discussed the progress the government has made in breaking down complex and lofty language, thus making regulations more comprehensible. The concern, Sunstein said, is bipartisan and comes from businesses, public interest groups and “countless individual citizens.”

After President Barack Obama took office in 2010, he directed rules to be written in plain language to make them easy to understand. He also said regulations “shall be adopted through a process that involves public participation,” including an “open exchange of information and perspectives,” Sunstein writes.

After the passage of the Plain Writing Act of 2010, agencies began concentrated efforts to paring down rhetoric. Today, many agencies have a website dedicated to plain language and have tasked specific officials with overseeing plain writing efforts. 

Building on that effort to strip regulation language, the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs on Jan 4 directed agencies to provide the public with straightforward executive summaries of all rules. With separate descriptions of all key provisions and policy choices, these summaries will detail the need for the rule and explain its legal basis.

“The use of clear, simple executive summaries will make it far easier for members of the public to understand and to scrutinize proposed rules – and thus help to improve them,” Sunstein wrote. “And for final rules, such summaries will make it far easier for people to understand what they are being asked to do."

About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Shutterstock image: looking for code.

    How DOD embraced bug bounties -- and how your agency can, too

    Hack the Pentagon proved to Defense Department officials that outside hackers can be assets, not adversaries.

  • Shutterstock image: cyber defense.

    Why PPD-41 is evolutionary, not revolutionary

    Government cybersecurity officials say the presidential policy directive codifies cyber incident response protocols but doesn't radically change what's been in practice in recent years.

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

Reader comments

Tue, Apr 3, 2012 Leslyn CA

I did a quick scan of Sunstein's language using a tool called the "Fog Index." The Fog Index measures sentence length and complex words. Longer sentences and more complex words make writing harder to understand. Most people like to read at a Fog Index level of about 6-8. They are "fogged in" at about 12--they have either lost interest, or they don't understand. Sunstein's Fog Index was 10.8. If she's going to advocate for simple writing, she ought to take a look at her own. How we write is often how we tend to speak. BTW, I also calculated a Fog Index on this comment--without any rewriting first. It is 5.6.

Tue, Apr 3, 2012 RT

the executive summary may be an interpretation that doesn't match the rule - every time the government tries to do something it ends up with the opposite result. sigh

Tue, Apr 3, 2012 A former Fed Maryland

Now if we can only get Feds to think simply and plan modest, affordable solutions to important problems instead of hiding Empire Solutions under Grand names

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group