Federal managers doubt cloud computing's cost-savings claims

Despite mandates that direct federal agencies to transition to cloud-based services, federal IT managers express reluctance in making the migration due to security concerns, a survey reveals.

The 2011 State of Cloud Services in the U.S. Federal Government poll from Ponemon Institute shows that more than one-third of the managers surveyed cited safety concerns as one of the reasons for not using cloud services. An even bigger number of respondents (42 percent) said lack of suitable applications or services prevent them from using a cloud approach. 

Related story:

A fast lane to the cloud

But security emerged as the primary fear. Nearly half the respondents said they were “not confident” about the overall data protection and security features of their current or prospective cloud service providers. Twenty-six percent chose “confident,” while only 17 percent stated they were “very confident.”

The majority of respondents (56 percent) also said the pressure to move to the cloud inadvertently creates security risks for their organization. Sixty-two percent also said their organization has applications and data that are too sensitive to move to the cloud environment.

Respondents had varying opinions on who is most responsible for cloud security. For the few agencies using private clouds (12 percent), most thought their organization, rather than the cloud provider, should be most responsible for security. In a public cloud, however, which 30 percent of the sur\veyed agencies use, more respondents said the cloud provider should be tasked with keeping the environment safe. (The remaining agencies use a semi-public cloud shared with any government organization (33 percent), or a semi-public cloud shared with a limited number of U.S. federal government organizations (25 percent).

Most respondents were also not sold on the promises of cloud computing as a long-term money saver. Only 12 percent said the cloud could bring significant cost saving, while one-third said the cloud would have no impact on cost. Nearly 20 percent thought the cloud would result in some cost increase; 6 percent said a cloud migration would lead to significant cost increase.

Most respondents said they were “somewhat familiar” with the “cloud-first” initiative, and more than half said they have partially complied with the directive in identifying only one or two cloud services. Less than one-third said they have achieved full compliance with the strategy to move three or more services to the cloud.

More than 500 government professionals were surveyed, with the majority (36 percent) holding a managerial position. Most respondents were employed at defense or civilian agencies and the executive branch.


About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

Nominate Today!

Nominations for the 2018 Federal 100 Awards are now being accepted, and are due by Dec. 23. 


Reader comments

Thu, Feb 2, 2012 TXFed TX

Rather than a "cloud-first" policy, we really need a "improve-the-network-first" policy, then perhaps a "cloud-second" policy. For example, when I some services on my agency cloud, I LITERALLY have to plan my work around when the west coast starts work because the additional users cause the network to lag so bad the services time out before any additional work can be completed/saved. This means I often have to plan to work after 8 PM or on weekends, and while I appreciate the overtime, I find it hard to believe that this is in the best interest of my agency or it's customers. Just sayin'....

Thu, Feb 2, 2012

Everyone talks of the cloud but not of the excessive overhead required for the data exchange. I have trouble within our own network running a program even remotely computational against the server due to bandwidth restrictions. If we go to cloud, not only will sensitive data be open for all to crack but I may as well find a hobby because I'll have a lot of down time waiting for things to run. And let's not even discuss COOP with this.

Thu, Feb 2, 2012 Lou

Another smoke and mirror trick sponsored & endorsed by big government. The only secure cloud is a closed one, and even then there are security risks (USB devices). Networked clouds secure, forgetaboudit!! Proof you ask?? Anon & Lul showed us there are holes in fabric and nothing is secure.

Thu, Feb 2, 2012 Maria M.

...I believe...if one can read and analyze the article...the 36% was a majority position "category" of those surveyed. There may not have been 51% of those surveyed that held a particular position "title"....of the 500 surveyed, the largest title "category" was managerial....and that category was 36%..

Thu, Feb 2, 2012 Maria M

There are appropriate places for using a cloud approach...and places where the cloud should *not* be used. Outside forces should not be mandating use. PERIOD! 'Nuf said!

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group