Audit: Agencies still wasting billions with overlapping programs

A large number of federal programs are plagued with duplication, fragmentation and overlap, draining the government tens of billions of taxpayers’ dollars every year, according to the Government Accountability Office.

A new 426-page report follows up on a similar document GAO released in 2011 and outlines 51 newly-identified areas of duplication, overlap and fragmentation across government and recommends 130 actions. The areas include IT, transportation, job training, homelessness prevention and disaster response efforts, among others.

“Whether carrying out similar missions or funding similar projects, everything the government is doing once it is likely doing twice or three times and often not very well,” Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) said in his Feb. 28 testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Related story:

OMB outlines progress on eliminating government waste

Among the examples of duplicative efforts were 53 programs run by four separate agencies to help entrepreneurs with economic development, as well as nearly $80 billion funneled into more than 7,200 IT investments.

While the Office of Management and Budget provides direction on how agencies can report on their IT investments, the guidance doesn’t ensure comprehensive reporting or aid the identification of duplicative investments.

GAO found that the departments of Homeland Security, Defense and Energy need to address potentially duplicative IT investments to avoid investing in unnecessary systems. Although all three agencies have processes to identify duplicative investments, GAO found that 37 of 810 investments were potentially duplicative at DOD and Energy.

These investments account for about $1.2 billion in IT spending for 2007 through 2012 for DOD and Energy. While the watchdog didn’t find any potentially duplicative investments at DHS, officials there have independently pinpointed several duplicative investments and systems. The department plans to consolidate systems within these investments by 2014 to save $41 million.

Officials from the three agencies provided various explanations for the potential duplication, including decentralized governance within the department and a lack of control over certain facilities. Certain investments are also misclassified by function, which complicates agency’s work in identifying duplicative investments.

Asked by the committee what causes the overall problem with duplication, Comptroller General and GAO head Gene Dodaro cited a lack of oversight and processes that would give insight into which programs work effectively. Coburn, on the other hand, singled out Congress as the main culprit, saying duplication was created by career politicians “seeking to slap short-term fixes on problems in order to claim credit at home and recognition in Washington.”

Office of Management and Budget Controller Danny Werfel wrote on the OMBlog that almost 80 percent of the issues GAO raised in 2011 had been addressed, either fully or partially. But Congress, on the other hand, had tackled less than 40 percent of GAO’s recommendations, he said.

“No matter how difficult it may be to cut this waste, the administration is committed to getting the job done,” Werfel commented.

About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

Nominate Today!

Nominations for the 2018 Federal 100 Awards are now being accepted, and are due by Dec. 23. 


Reader comments

Thu, Mar 1, 2012

Every five years or so, another blue-ribbon commission issues pretty much the same report- just by cutting duplication, you could take a big chunk out of deficit. It'll never happen until we get 535 people in congress worried more about doing their job than getting reelected, and a POTUS that has the guts to stand up to congress and pentagon and say 'no more studies- Just Do It!'

Wed, Feb 29, 2012 Bill Mid-America

Geez, all these $ billions wasted and they want to freeze my salary and change my retirements benefits to save the government money...

Wed, Feb 29, 2012 Cowboy Joe

At present, there are two mutually incompatible concepts at work here - well, aside from the obvious "democrat" and "republican". "Competition" and "Consolidation" just don't play well together, and our contracting law is written to promote the former at the mostly unintended fettering of the latter. Creating "Open Standards", which is a "governmental" function, help create a viable solution space, but one that business inherently opposes. Follow the money.

Wed, Feb 29, 2012 Wright Patt Fed Wright-Patt AFB

This problem would be hard enough without the political aspect. With the political aspect, it is probably impossible. Still, it is all executive branch, and therefore the buck stops with the administration. An exhaustive review of programs/offices and there associated objectives and resources would reveal a lot. However, with a congress that is more concerned with bringing home bacon than governing the country efficientlyl and effectively, good luck.

Wed, Feb 29, 2012

Amazing that it takes a study to realize the overlapping. It's all about job security, budget justification and plain human nature. Good luck in changing the status quo.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group