Charting the impact of OMB's temporary 2010 financial systems halt

The Office of Management and Budget’s 2010 decision to halt 30 financial management projects had little impact on the cost and completion time of many programs, but agencies saw other shortcomings from the freeze, according to the Government Accountability Office.

GAO found that most agencies reported no change or that they did not know how the long-term project cost or completion time would change as an outcome of the actions, decisions and recommendations related to OMB’s June 28, 2010 memorandum.

The memo laid out governmentwide policies associated with financial system overhauls, requiring agencies to come up with plans on how to make financial system modernizations more cost-efficient. The memo also directed agencies to find ways to better align projects with high-priority business needs as well as enhance their financial systems. While they were conducting the reviews, the agencies were to enter into no new contracts or task orders, under the memo's terms.

Despite lack of adverse effect on cost and timelines, agencies experienced other drawbacks of the freeze. Several agencies reported that their new focus on adopting more critical business needs delayed their work to improve accounting and reporting functions. One agency, for example, found that OMB disapproved its project to upgrade its accounting software to a current version, which hampered the agency’s ability to keep its systems secure and implement new technology.

Agencies also found that standardization of internal processes or data and funding delays to be particularly challenging. Twelve of 22 agencies said standardization of internal processes or data is a main or moderate roadblock. Nine agencies cited funding delays as a significant or moderate challenge. One agency reported that continuing delays make planning difficult as the program manager is unable to begin new projects until funding status has been set. 

About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Shutterstock image: looking for code.

    How DOD embraced bug bounties -- and how your agency can, too

    Hack the Pentagon proved to Defense Department officials that outside hackers can be assets, not adversaries.

  • Shutterstock image: cyber defense.

    Why PPD-41 is evolutionary, not revolutionary

    Government cybersecurity officials say the presidential policy directive codifies cyber incident response protocols but doesn't radically change what's been in practice in recent years.

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group