DHS' low morale becomes congressional matter

Over time, surveys have shown that employees at the Homeland Security Department are consistently less satisfied than the government-wide average, according to testimony presented at a House subcommittee hearing on March 21.

The trend began in 2004, when a White House-sponsored survey showed that 56 percent of DHS employees said they were satisfied with their jobs, compared to 68 percent government-wide, David Maurer, director of the homeland security and justice team at the Government Accountability Office, testified at the hearing.

In subsequent years, DHS employees continued to report lower satisfaction, ranging from an 8 percent difference in 2006 to a 4 percent disparity in 2011, Maurer told the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations and Management.

While DHS workers generally had less positive statements about their work in comparison to other federal employees, there was no statistical difference on satisfaction with pay.

Furthermore, surveys showed that DHS components have different levels of satisfaction, with the Transportation Security Administration scoring 11 percentage points below federal averages while Customs and Border Protection scored above average.

Catherine Emerson, chief human capital officer for DHS, testified that efforts to improve morale are ongoing.

Furthermore, she suggested that the most recent drop in satisfaction at DHS was part of a broader trend.

“Our drop in Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey scores between 2010 and 2011 was mirrored government-wide to a lesser degree, suggesting external factors also shaped 2011 results,” Emerson said.

DHS is applying a strategy to improve employee morale, including establishing an Employee Engagement Executive Steering Committee.

Other features of the strategy include improved communications, training, diversity, inclusion and employee recognition, as well as strengthening of management leadership skills.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Shutterstock image: looking for code.

    How DOD embraced bug bounties -- and how your agency can, too

    Hack the Pentagon proved to Defense Department officials that outside hackers can be assets, not adversaries.

  • Shutterstock image: cyber defense.

    Why PPD-41 is evolutionary, not revolutionary

    Government cybersecurity officials say the presidential policy directive codifies cyber incident response protocols but doesn't radically change what's been in practice in recent years.

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

Reader comments

Wed, Apr 18, 2012

I feel that management only looks out for themselves and do nothing to strength their employees career. A lot of management is young and some have come from the private sector and don't understand how to treat employees. I'ts a power thing to climb up to the top regardless of who they step on.

Mon, Mar 26, 2012

A day late and a dollar short. Too bad I had to quit because there is incompetence at its highest, racism, poor management if any exists, horrible moral, humiliation, threats, and utter chaos. I wouldn't advise anyone to work for this agency if you value your physical and mental health. In my 43 yrs of working this was the absolute worse. Employees are so unhappy and miserable I would liken it to a war zone. All their surveys and strategies are an absolute waste of taxpayer money. Been doing them for years and NOTHING changed, It has only gotten WORSE!!!!!!! Absolutely horrible!!!!!!!!!1

Fri, Mar 23, 2012

The new Town Hall Meetings are great except when the personnel leading the sessions are the problems to begin with. Need unbiased personnel chairing the Town Halls.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group