Who's watching? 10 agencies lack permanent IG.

Inspectors general fulfill a critical role in monitoring agency operations, but at least 10 agencies have had unfilled vacancies in that office for months, or even years. Four have been without a permanent IG for more than 1,000 days.

Research by the Project on Government Oversight reveals that the departments of State, Interior and Labor and the Corporation for National & Community Service top the list of agencies that have gone without an IG the longest. State’s IG vacancy dates back to Jan. 16, 2008 – more than four years. Interior hasn’t had a consistent, permanent IG for 1,143 days, or since Feb. 23, 2009. And last time Labor had a permanent IG was July 13, 2009, nearly three years ago.

Among that quartet, only CNCS has currently a nominee in place for the IG role; however, it’s been more than 140 days since President Barack Obama on Nov. 15, 2011 tapped Deborah Jeffrey for that position. Similarly, the Homeland Security Department’s IG-to-be, Roslyn A. Mazer, was nominated 265 days ago, on July 21, 2011.

As the stewards of good government, IGs conduct independent reviews and audits of agency activity. The president appoints cabinet-level IGs whom the Senate then confirms. Others IGs are designated by their respective agency heads.

Once an IG has been nominated, it takes an average of 140 days to confirm him or her. “It’s a relatively quick process – not lightning quick but certainly quicker than 1,500 days,” said POGO investigator Jake Wiens.  

Not having a permanent IG doesn’t necessarily equal complete lack of oversight. Some agencies have acting or temporary IGs or directors of investigations and other staff. But having a permanent IG, particularly one that requires confirmation, Wiens said, adds to the credibility expected by the public, stakeholders and Congress.

The best IGs also try to figure out what the biggest challenges are for the agency and then focus audits and investigations on their findings, which oftentimes is hard to do without a permanent IG, Wiens said.

Overall, the IG vacancy issue is not so much an issue tied to the Senate blocking nominations but more the lack of actual nominations from the administration or agency’s side, he explained.

“[Agencies] may say otherwise, but judging by their actions, this doesn’t seem to be a priority at all -- something they don’t care to do,” Wiens added.

To read POGO's list of agencies that lack a permanent IG, click here.

About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

Rising Stars

Meet 21 early-career leaders who are doing great things in federal IT.

Featured

  • SEC Chairman Jay Clayton

    SEC owns up to 2016 breach

    A key database of financial information was breached in 2016, possibly in support of insider trading, said the Securities and Exchange Commission.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DOD looks to get aggressive about cloud adoption

    Defense leaders and Congress are looking to encourage more aggressive cloud policies and prod reluctant agencies to embrace experimentation and risk-taking.

  • Shutterstock / Pictofigo

    The next big thing in IT procurement

    Steve Kelman talks to the agencies that have embraced tech demos in their acquisition efforts -- and urges others in government to give it a try.

  • broken lock

    DHS bans Kaspersky from federal systems

    The Department of Homeland Security banned the Russian cybersecurity company Kaspersky Lab’s products from federal agencies in a new binding operational directive.

  • man planning layoffs

    USDA looks to cut CIOs as part of reorg

    The Department of Agriculture is looking to cut down on the number of agency CIOs in the name of efficiency and better communication across mission areas.

  • What's next for agency cyber efforts?

    Ninety days after the Trump administration's executive order, FCW sat down with agency cyber leaders to discuss what’s changing.

Reader comments

Sat, Apr 14, 2012 MAH DC

Another reader commented that the wuthor seems to lack understanding of the process - but didn't bother to read any of the linked information. The 10 current vacancies have a total of 2 nominations. The State Department vacancy has been open since January 2009 without a nomination. While confirmations could delay filling positions, that's not the case this time. Without the administration prioritizing a nomination action, the Senate doesn't have a chance to drag its feet or speed them through. It seems disengenious to blame them this time... and makes a reader wonder about motivation.

Thu, Apr 12, 2012 AK DC

Seems odd to say this isn't tied to the Senate confirmation process. The author seems to lack understanding of the process. The President nominates people all the time, and the Senate blocks them. It isn't just IG's, it is plenty of other important officials, like general counsels. Finding a candidate that can make it through in this day and age of political tensions is not easy. So to place most of the blame on the President is not really accurate or fair, nor understanding of the dynamics involved.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group