GOP plan to nix sequester moves forward

A House panel has passed a duo of bills that would avoid the automatic cuts triggered by the so-called super committee's failure last year to identify $1.2 trillion in budget-reduction measures.

The House Budget Committee voted May 7 to approve the Sequester Replacement Act in an effort to halt the across-the-board cuts set to kick in January 2013. Also passed was the Sequester Replacement Reconciliation Act, which aims to slash mandatory spending by $324 billion on top of the $1.2 trillion required by the Budget Control Act.

The sequester “is bad policy, would devastate our military, and should be replaced with more sensible savings,” Paul Ryan (R-Wisc), chairman of the committee, said in a statement following the passage of the GOP-introduced acts.

His statement echoed previous warnings from Defense Department officials such as Secretary Leon Panetta and Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who have cautioned of the ramifications of a sequester.

The GOP proposals aim to replace the across-the-board cuts with “reductions in lower-priority spending while laying the groundwork for further efforts to avert the spending-driven economic crisis before us,” Ryan said. More specifically, the legislation would introduce more targeted cuts to health care, federal employee pensions and social services, among other areas.

However, the proposals could well meet the same fate as the attempted bipartisn negotiations that failed and led to the imposition of the sequester in the first place. Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), ranking member of the committee, called the Republican-backed package “flawed,” saying it “continues the lopsided approach of the full Republican budget.” He criticized the proposed elimination of the Social Services Block Grant program, which he said helps 23 million children and adults receive essential services, and other cuts to health care coverage for children, seniors and other needy Americans.

“We do think that’s a better approach, by far, than the meat-ax approach that the sequester would impose,” he said in remarks delivered at the committee’s markup of the two act. “But we need to come together and develop that kind of balanced approach to getting it done."

About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Shutterstock image: looking for code.

    How DOD embraced bug bounties -- and how your agency can, too

    Hack the Pentagon proved to Defense Department officials that outside hackers can be assets, not adversaries.

  • Shutterstock image: cyber defense.

    Why PPD-41 is evolutionary, not revolutionary

    Government cybersecurity officials say the presidential policy directive codifies cyber incident response protocols but doesn't radically change what's been in practice in recent years.

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

Reader comments

Thu, May 10, 2012

DoD is lying. They could meet their budget reductions with no loss of mission effectiveness, just by cutting out the duploation, both internally, and between them and the rest of FedGov. Every Dod unit and function that duplicates something on civilian side should be handed over to civilian side. It'd take a couple years, but would save billions.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group