DOD business modernization efforts continue to fall short

It’s been an uphill battle to modernize the Defense Department’s endemic financial bookkeeping struggles, and it looks like the struggle is still underway, according to a new Government Accountability Office report.

Poor governance, implementation failures and inadequate inventory and manpower are among the chief reasons DOD has made limited progress in modernizing its incongruent and archaic business systems, the report said.

“Since 1995, GAO has designated DOD’s business systems modernization program as high risk, and it continues to do so today,” GAO reported. “While the department has initiated numerous activities aimed at addressing [business modernization mandates], it has been limited in its ability to demonstrate results.”

Since 2005, DOD has been required by that year’s that fiscal year’s National Defense Authorization Act to problems in DOD’s business systems and report annually to Congress on progress. Each year GAO has also reviewed the progress and made recommendations – some of which have been put in place, and some that continue to trouble the department.

For example, DOD has not implemented guidelines from GAO’s IT investment management framework since the auditor last reviewed the department in 2011, and hasn’t measured or reported results from a GAO-recommended review process.

In addition, DOD continues to describe ongoing certification plans and actions for updating business systems – $2.2 billion worth in modernization spending – but GAO stated that bases and approvals for the actions is supported only by limited information.

Perhaps one of the biggest problems faced by the Deputy Chief Management Office, tasked with the modernization efforts, is a dearth of manpower.

According to the report, the DCMO “lacks the full complement of staff it identified as needed to perform business systems modernization responsibilities” – including 41 percent of its positions remaining unfilled.

DOD officials, including Deputy Chief Management Officer Elizabeth McGrath, have defended their efforts and stipulated that progress has been made, including at an April hearing before Congress.

“Achieving this important objective at DOD is no routine task. It requires an enterprise-wide response and an effective strategy,” McGrath said in a testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee. “Over the past year the department has taken a number of steps to improve its overarching business environment … [we have] continued to mature business transformation-related processes, architectural framework and governance that support our transition to a more modern and disciplined business environment.”

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1986, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

  • Shutterstock image.

    Merged IT modernization bill punts on funding

    A House panel approved a new IT modernization bill that appears poised to pass, but key funding questions are left for appropriators.

  • General Frost

    Army wants cyber capability everywhere

    The Army's cyber director said cyber, electronic warfare and information operations must be integrated into warfighters' doctrine and training.

  • Rising Star 2013

    Meet the 2016 Rising Stars

    FCW honors 30 early-career leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Tue, Jun 5, 2012 Stilton49 DC area

This article seemed largely like a press release. Is there any reporting done at Wash Tech?

Tue, Jun 5, 2012 Cowboy Joe

One of the biggest differences between the public and private sector, is that when a private sector contractor fails to deliver to a private sector customer the contract ends, and sometimes there are even lawsuits and black listings against the provider. When a private sector company fails to deliver to a public sector customer to the tune of "$6B over budget and 31 years behind schedule" ... hey! It seems like bonuses all around, and double funded contract options to boot!

Tue, Jun 5, 2012

I agree if you do a good job for your employer you never get anywhere but if you screw up you will move up.

Mon, Jun 4, 2012 Christopher Hanks United States

A four-step lesson on the difference between government and the private sector: 1.As pointed out in the referenced Senate hearing in April on DOD financial management, the Department’s "Enterprise Resource Planning" efforts are cumulatively $6 billion over budget and 31 years behind schedule. 2.Elizabeth Mcgrath, the DOD’s Deputy Chief Management Officer, has (in effect) been doing the DCMO job for five years. The DCMO job came into existence in 2007. DOD created the position in response to Congressional demands for someone to take over full responsibility for turning around the Department’s big business IT systems efforts. Ms. McGrath was officially appointed as the first DCMO in July 2010, and before that she was the Acting DCMO or Assistant DCMO running the DCMO operation. 3. The Chief Risk Officer for JP Morgan Chase, Ms Ina Drew, was fired recently for overseeing an office that lost $2 billion for the bank. 4. Note the difference between the private sector and the government. In the private sector, when you fail to do your job and cost your employer a lot of money, you lose your job. In the government, when you fail to do your job and cost your employer a lot of money, Federal Computer Week does an article about you.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group