White House, committee spar over acquisition workforce training funds

The Obama administration does not want Congress to cut funds for Defense Department acquisition employees' training.

The administration opposes a House committee’s proposal to reduce funding for the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund, cutting it nearly in half compared to fiscal 2012’s appropriation.

The fund is a key tool for the Defense Department to alleviate some of the long-standing challenges associated with training the acquisition workforce. It also provides additional funds for the recruitment, training, and retention of acquisition personnel. DOD expects to use the fund's money to hire approximately 10,000 new acquisition personnel through fiscal 2015. Approximately $1.8 billion was allocated to the fund through February 2012, according to a recent Government Accountability Office report.

The House Appropriations Committee recommended $50.2 million for the fund in fiscal 2013, according to the Defense Department Appropriations Act (H.R. 5856).

In fiscal 2012, Congress gave the fund $106 million, and the president requested $274.2 million for 2013.

If Congress doesn’t provide the full request of $274 million, administration officials warn that DOD would have to collect from other budgets to account for the shortfall between the appropriation and the statutory minimum for the development fund.

“The reduction in the appropriation would put unnecessary stress on the operation and maintenance budget at a time when funding levels are already constrained,” administration officials wrote June 28 in a statement of administration policy regarding the spending bill.

The bill has not been passed by the House yet.

The Appropriations Committee said the president’s budget request would meet the statutory $944 million level, but defense representatives do not believe that DOD needs that amount of funding to achieve the fund’s goals next year. As a result, the committee doesn’t want to put so much appropriated money into the fund.

Congress’ conference report on the fiscal 2012 Consolidated Appropriations Act warned the funding would go down for the development fund because of unobligated balances that have sat in the fund for the past several years.

Fund managers told GAO though the delays in collecting and then distributing the development fund's money caused uncertainties. That sense of ambiguity, along with revisions on how officials would use the money, prevented large sums from being spent and instead carried over to the next fiscal year.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1986, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

  • Shutterstock image.

    Merged IT modernization bill punts on funding

    A House panel approved a new IT modernization bill that appears poised to pass, but key funding questions are left for appropriators.

  • General Frost

    Army wants cyber capability everywhere

    The Army's cyber director said cyber, electronic warfare and information operations must be integrated into warfighters' doctrine and training.

  • Rising Star 2013

    Meet the 2016 Rising Stars

    FCW honors 30 early-career leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Mon, Jul 9, 2012

The best training is hands-on. I find most classes a general waste of time and money. And the more expensive the class (primarily travel expenses), the less useful it is in many cases. We have some people taking all sorts of classes and not around enough at times to do their required work in a timely manner - another big waste. The tax payers really get the bad end of the deal on a vast majority of the training I see being done here.

Mon, Jul 9, 2012

I agree with the first two responses that "you get what you pay for in this world" Unfortunately, most of the spending on acquisition training has been focused on earning certifications rather than learning how to better manage contracts and acquisitions. DAU has successfully driven the cost per student down for training. This "check-the-box" training doesn't serve any purpose other than allowing individuals to collect badges. A better process for learning that is more experiencial, validates the tranfer of knowledge and offers an improved environment for learning reinforcement is necessary. If training improved, perhaps we wouldn't need 10,000 new employees. Instead, we could spend more on improving the skills of the people we have today.

Sat, Jul 7, 2012 New Jersey

I thought this was just another attack by Congress until I saw the second to last paragraph. If there are unobligated balances that have sat in the fund for the past several years then the SESs involved obviously have not used the money. Meanwhile we consistently get wait-listed for needed courses. Sounds like we need a wake-up at DAU and DOD Training activities.

Fri, Jul 6, 2012

I am in aquisition and from what I have seen from the training to date, it could be scrapped! I'm OK cutting the funding as long as they also cut all the training and certification requirements that go with it.

Fri, Jul 6, 2012 Peter G. Tuttle, CPCM

Well, you get what you pay for in this world. If you don't pay to keep your acquisition workforce trained (or to keep your workforce in the first place), you'll eventually end up wondering why your Agency keeps ending up in court, at GAO, on the front page of the Washington Post, or is the subject of case studies at various law schools. We actually have the opportunity NOT to make the same mistakes made in the early 1990's which gutted the acquisition workforce.....so, let's not make them. Let's not be penny-wise and pound-foolish...for once.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group