Acquisition chiefs need clearer roles and responsibilities, GAO says

Agencies need to do a better job at clarifying what their chief acquisition officers are supposed to do for the sake of the organization, according to a new report.

Many departments don’t have documents defining those duties, and as a result they may lack a strong basis for more permanently including the CAO within their organizational leadership structure, the Government Accountability Office wrote in a report released July 26.

“Clearly defined roles and responsibilities for each stakeholder in the acquisition process is a key element of an effective acquisition function,” GAO wrote.

The amount of detail on an agency’s CAO’s authorities and responsibilities varies greatly based on the agency’s Federal Acquisition Regulation supplement and other policy documentation, GAO said.

GAO recommended that the Office of Federal Procurement Policy tell agencies to define the CAOs’ roles and responsibilities. OFPP agreed with the recommendation, according to the report.

CAOs at 16 agencies that GAO spoke with said they were not facing significant challenges related to their work. They didn’t complain about their level of influence in the acquisition process or the amount of control they have over acquisition budget resources. They also believe they had access to agency leadership.

In addition, few CAOs had acquisition management as their primary duty, and they did not dislike it, according to the report. In fact, some CAOs told GAO that it helped. Some CAOs are in charge of financial matters, information management, and human capital resources. These extra roles help them have a better influence on acquisition across their agencies.

But, as GAO has found in its other research of the acquisition workforce, agencies can always use more people.

“Most CAOs reported that not having enough staff to manage acquisitions was moderately to extremely challenging,” GAO reported.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Mon, Jul 30, 2012

The CAO position was to be filled with experienced acquisition personnel. For the most part Agencies get a failed grade. Many Agencies use the positions as "temporary" to park people before taking on a political position. In a time of need for acquisition leadership agencies should review and comply with the CAO position requirements and work for a better acquisition workforce!

Mon, Jul 30, 2012 FedUpwithDoDPolitics

Not sure what "Roles and responsibilities" need to provided. Let's just say following US Law and guidelines. It's not that PM's are unknowing, its that ACQ do not challege what they hear and see to be wrong. If your kid breaks a window and you ask "Did you do this?" What does the kid always say? What the does the parent follow up by saying? Please stop all this garbage on Roles/Responsibilities. Enough already!!

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group