How a few words could change small-business set-aside picture

The Obama administration wants contracting officers to set aside solicitations for research and development for small business if they expect that capable companies exist and would be interested, according to a proposed rule. But the wording of a provision in the Federal Acquisition Regulation regarding research and development procurements is raising concern at the Small Business Administration, according to Federal Register notice published Aug. 10.

The FAR states:

“In making R&D small business set-asides, there must also be a reasonable expectation of obtaining from small businesses the best scientific and technological sources consistent with the demands of the proposed acquisition for the best mix of cost, performances, and schedules.”

Acquisition officials at the Defense Department, NASA, and the General Services Administration have proposed a revision that removes the phrase: “consistent with the demands of the proposed acquisition for the best mix of cost, performances, and schedules.”

SBA officials say agencies see this is an additional and unique condition that contracting officers have to establish before they can proceed with small-business set-asides. But, they say, it shouldn't be. The proposed new wording makes clear that the contracting officer need only determine that there are small businesses capable of handling the specialized work -- based on market research -- in order to justify the set-aside. (The other two conditions for a set-aside, that there be at least two small businesses that can compete, and that fair-market prices are in effect, also apply.)

The proposed rule is intended to remove any potential barriers for small businesses.

Officials are accepting comments on the proposed rule through Oct. 9.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

The Fed 100

Save the date for 28th annual Federal 100 Awards Gala.

Featured

  • computer network

    How Einstein changes the way government does business

    The Department of Commerce is revising its confidentiality agreement for statistical data survey respondents to reflect the fact that the Department of Homeland Security could see some of that data if it is captured by the Einstein system.

  • Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. Army photo by Monica King. Jan. 26, 2017.

    Mattis mulls consolidation in IT, cyber

    In a Feb. 17 memo, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told senior leadership to establish teams to look for duplication across the armed services in business operations, including in IT and cybersecurity.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DHS vague on rules for election aid, say states

    State election officials had more questions than answers after a Department of Homeland Security presentation on the designation of election systems as critical U.S. infrastructure.

  • Org Chart Stock Art - Shutterstock

    How the hiring freeze targets millennials

    The government desperately needs younger talent to replace an aging workforce, and experts say that a freeze on hiring doesn't help.

  • Shutterstock image: healthcare digital interface.

    VA moves ahead with homegrown scheduling IT

    The Department of Veterans Affairs will test an internally developed scheduling module at primary care sites nationwide to see if it's ready to service the entire agency.

  • Shutterstock images (honglouwawa & 0beron): Bitcoin image overlay replaced with a dollar sign on a hardware circuit.

    MGT Act poised for a comeback

    After missing in the last Congress, drafters of a bill to encourage cloud adoption are looking for a new plan.

Reader comments

Wed, Aug 15, 2012

I am seriously thinking about putting in my retirement papers.

Tue, Aug 14, 2012 Raul Espinosa

Although pleased that FCW is finally devoting more attention to small businesses and their 'barriers,' which for years have been ignored, by both the government and by the media, I cannot let the opportunity afforded by Matt's article to make a simple observation.

It is my personal experience that Agencies are neither overseeing nor demanding that the compliant research which FAR 10 requires on all public contracts be performed. That fact combined with the dysfunctional procurement culture that allows, for example, 'unfair justifications' to exist, wont be affected by the language used on the regulations. It wont matter. Bureaucrats will continue to offer preferential treatment to their own friends and/or suppliers.

Bringing transparency to the arena, however, will. The tracking of the results in government contracting; the reporting of the abuses and the punishment of the violators, on the other hand, will achieve the intended results.

Wanting something does is one thing. Getting the intended results is another. Small businesses are tired of the bureaucrats lip service. Clean up the house, overhaul the system and then we will have results and achieve savings for the taxpayers.

Raul Espinosa
Founder/CEO - Fairness in Procurement Alliance (FPA)
Managing Partner - Umbrella Initiative
Board Member - Nat'l. Fed. Contractors Assoc. (NaFCA)

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group