Are small-business set-asides helping?

The story of a small business begun in a garage or a spare bedroom growing into a global juggernaut is the stuff of legends — and policy.

The government wants to encourage the growth of small businesses because they create jobs and, when successful, help grow the economy. Congress, as it often does, dealt with that desire by passing a law requiring that a certain percentage of federal government spending be directed to small businesses in a variety of categories and flavors: minority owned, woman owned, Alaska native owned, to name only a few. In this issue, we look at how that plan has been working. It is a politically charged discussion with fervent supporters and detractors on each side. And, as usual, government executives are caught in the middle.

As a number of consultants have pointed out, whenever there is a bucket of money set aside, it will attract not only legitimate and qualified companies but also those that want to game the system for the reward.

From government, we hear of concerns about the capabilities of small companies to perform some of the work that has been set aside for them. And as the bar in contracting tilts back toward low price, we hear concerns about how small business can deliver those required low prices without the volume buys available to large companies.

There is no question that this is a delicate balance as government seeks to infuse capital into one market segment without damaging the other. Large businesses have spent millions in bid and proposal funds to secure a place on agency contracts only to find in this election year that most of the task orders are designated for small business.

None of this is to suggest that America’s entrepreneurs should not be a vital part of the federal technology ecosystem. But after nearly 35 years of small-business contracting goals, it’s worth asking how the set-asides are doing in delivering the intended results. FCW reporter Matthew Weigelt takes that on in our feature, "Do small-business preferences make the grade?"

About the Author

Anne Armstrong is Co-President & Chief Content Officer of 1105 Public Sector Media Group.



FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Tue, Sep 11, 2012 Nate

The concept of small business set-asides seems to be half broken. The intention is to create quota requirements so small businesses can compete, grow, and build jobs. However, the majority of these awards are still gobbled up by large integrators and VAR's with various pass through agreements where the actual contract is placed with a small business reseller. This does not create manufacturing or long standing wealth. A real and innovative change would be to have some of these set asides be targeted at the actual manufacturer/technology developer so those companies can grow and develop new and innovative technologies to expand globally.

Tue, Sep 11, 2012 OccupyIT

Anne, where are you going with this? This is a little fluffy journalism. Sounds a bit too much like a condescending back-hand complement – which clearly it is intended to be. Got facts? Got conclusion? Burry the lead? You should frankly rewrite it or remove it.

Mon, Sep 10, 2012 Raul Espinosa

Is the Obama Administration supporting set-asides? His record demonstrates that he is NOT. The Obama outreach strategy - announced in 2009 to increase small businesses participation in government contracting - has been a failure, Under the Obama Administration, Agencies have NEVER met their 23% statutory goals and they have been caught lying about their results in contracting with small businesses. Under the Obama watch, Federal Agencies have excluded over $100 Billion in contracts from the set-aside provisions of the Small Business Act. Those exclusions could have been used to increase the share of set-aside to as much as 35%! Again, is Obama supporting small businesses? He is opposed to the House proposed increase in the set-aside ceiling from 23% to 25%, which passed the House with bi-partisan support. The Senate will be taking up the subject on the 2013 DoD appropriations Bill. Senators are being urged to support the 25% ceiling and their vote will be closely monitored.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group