Are small-business set-asides helping?

The story of a small business begun in a garage or a spare bedroom growing into a global juggernaut is the stuff of legends — and policy.

The government wants to encourage the growth of small businesses because they create jobs and, when successful, help grow the economy. Congress, as it often does, dealt with that desire by passing a law requiring that a certain percentage of federal government spending be directed to small businesses in a variety of categories and flavors: minority owned, woman owned, Alaska native owned, to name only a few. In this issue, we look at how that plan has been working. It is a politically charged discussion with fervent supporters and detractors on each side. And, as usual, government executives are caught in the middle.

As a number of consultants have pointed out, whenever there is a bucket of money set aside, it will attract not only legitimate and qualified companies but also those that want to game the system for the reward.

From government, we hear of concerns about the capabilities of small companies to perform some of the work that has been set aside for them. And as the bar in contracting tilts back toward low price, we hear concerns about how small business can deliver those required low prices without the volume buys available to large companies.

There is no question that this is a delicate balance as government seeks to infuse capital into one market segment without damaging the other. Large businesses have spent millions in bid and proposal funds to secure a place on agency contracts only to find in this election year that most of the task orders are designated for small business.

None of this is to suggest that America’s entrepreneurs should not be a vital part of the federal technology ecosystem. But after nearly 35 years of small-business contracting goals, it’s worth asking how the set-asides are doing in delivering the intended results. FCW reporter Matthew Weigelt takes that on in our feature, "Do small-business preferences make the grade?"

About the Author

Anne Armstrong is Chief Content and Alliance Officer of Public Sector 360.

 

 


Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.