Legislation

Is cybersecurity legislation still alive?

As the likelihood of a cybersecurity executive order increases, voices both favoring and opposing the measure are growing louder, and at least one member of Congress insists legislation – which failed in the Senate, triggering the EO – isn’t completely dead.

Following weeks of speculation and leaked drafts, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano on Sept. 19 told Congress that the White House’s executive order is “close to completion.” There hasn’t been official word from any federal agency or office, but it’s expected the executive order will contain at least some elements of earlier legislation.

Supporters of the White House measure, such as Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D- W. Va.) and Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), are pushing for executive action in wake of the bipartisan Cybersecurity Act of 2012’s failure in the Senate. Opponents of the measure, including Rep. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas), are criticizing the administration for “overriding Congress.”

According to one congressman, hope is still alive that Congress will be able to pass a cybersecurity law – and that it would be more effective than a White House order.

“It may be coughing, it may be sputtering, but it’s not dead,” said Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), chairman of the House intelligence committee. “After the election we’re going to have a prime opportunity to come back and…take care of the things that are difficult to get done legislatively. We’re not giving up. I think there’s a good chance that we’re going to turn this around.”

Rogers, speaking Sept. 26 at the INSA Cyber Innovation Symposium in Washington, said he was concerned about the prospects of new regulation he thinks may come in the executive order, but also noted that he doesn’t know what specifically the order may entail.

“What we’re hearing is there’s no carrots and no sticks in the executive order. I don’t know what that gets you…but if there’s no carrots and no sticks, I’m not sure what changes from today,” he told reporters at the symposium. “What I’m concerned about is the new uncertainty of what is likely to be some form of regulation. Does that mean as a private sector IT shop I don’t invest in my system, I have to wait to determine if it’s compatible with what the government may or may not do? That uncertainty is dangerous when we’re under attack today.”

Rogers highlighted the serious cybersecurity concerns both industry and the government face today – economic espionage that costs the U.S. millions and the need for better information-sharing among them – but said new regulatory measures could hamper progress in keeping up with fast-moving cyber threats.

“Companies today are screaming for help, but it’s not regulation – it’s information. They don’t need a whole new bureaucracy or a whole new level of regulation; they need information that we collect as a government,” he said. “A regulatory scheme is slow, probably not the right way to get real-time information shared at business speed.”

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1986, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

  • Shutterstock image.

    Merged IT modernization bill punts on funding

    A House panel approved a new IT modernization bill that appears poised to pass, but key funding questions are left for appropriators.

  • General Frost

    Army wants cyber capability everywhere

    The Army's cyber director said cyber, electronic warfare and information operations must be integrated into warfighters' doctrine and training.

  • Rising Star 2013

    Meet the 2016 Rising Stars

    FCW honors 30 early-career leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Thu, Sep 27, 2012 MarkG Alexandria, VA

Getting effective cybersecurity legislation through Congress will be difficult for the simple reason that information security exists in an "economic trade space" for businesses . . . it is not an absolute risk but a relative one whose impact is often uncertain. In this post, I discuss how I first learned of this "trade space" from the Chief Internal Auditor of a global investment bank. And, I discuss the national security implications of not taking effective action on this problem: http://www.commercebasix.com/wordpress/?p=892

Thu, Sep 27, 2012

No amount of legislation will fix the cyber security problem, only reduce our civil liberties and violate the Constitution. I helped fight recent attempts to do so, and will continue to fight any subsequent attempts.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group