Systems Management

GSA to monitor response to award management system

Dan Tangherlini GSA image

Dan Tangherlini wants metrics for success on repairing the System for Award Management.

Dan Tangherlini, acting administrator of the General Services Administration, said Oct. 25 he will be watching in the coming months to see how other agencies react to his agency’s attempts to right a faulty acquisition management system. Those reactions will be his metric for success.

“The way I’m going to look at it is to see how our customers feel about it, and see how many complaints we’re getting from them and how easy it is to get their issues resolved,” Tangherlini said after a closed discussion session at the Coalition for Government Procurement’s Fall Conference.

Tangherlini recently moved responsibility for the System for Award Management (SAM) from GSA’s Office of Governmentwide Policy to Mary Davie, acting Federal Acquisition Service commissioner, and Casey Coleman, GSA’s CIO.

Tangherlini said Davie and Coleman’s first assignment in fixing SAM: set up metrics for success.

SAM is designed to integrate three acquisition data systems that store and make available information about contractors. The systems include the Central Contractor Registration, the Online Representations and Certifications Application, and the Excluded Parties List System. SAM is a part of the Integrated Acquisition Environment.

SAM went online in July and was taken off-line days later due to performance problems. GSA and IBM, the prime contractor in the project, have been working to fix the problems.

About the Authors

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Emily Cole is an editorial intern for FCW.

Rising Stars

Meet 21 early-career leaders who are doing great things in federal IT.

Featured

  • SEC Chairman Jay Clayton

    SEC owns up to 2016 breach

    A key database of financial information was breached in 2016, possibly in support of insider trading, said the Securities and Exchange Commission.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DOD looks to get aggressive about cloud adoption

    Defense leaders and Congress are looking to encourage more aggressive cloud policies and prod reluctant agencies to embrace experimentation and risk-taking.

  • Shutterstock / Pictofigo

    The next big thing in IT procurement

    Steve Kelman talks to the agencies that have embraced tech demos in their acquisition efforts -- and urges others in government to give it a try.

  • broken lock

    DHS bans Kaspersky from federal systems

    The Department of Homeland Security banned the Russian cybersecurity company Kaspersky Lab’s products from federal agencies in a new binding operational directive.

  • man planning layoffs

    USDA looks to cut CIOs as part of reorg

    The Department of Agriculture is looking to cut down on the number of agency CIOs in the name of efficiency and better communication across mission areas.

  • What's next for agency cyber efforts?

    Ninety days after the Trump administration's executive order, FCW sat down with agency cyber leaders to discuss what’s changing.

Reader comments

Wed, Oct 31, 2012 OccupyIT

"Tangherlini said Davie and Coleman’s first assignment in fixing SAM: set up metrics for success." I get he's new on the job but how many times do we have to listen to an agency purporting to be experts in IT acquisition hand us lessons learned about their screwed up acquisitions? Seriously, did they really start a massive IT project to replace the USG's acquisition systems without indicators of success or performance metrics. Sigh...

Mon, Oct 29, 2012 SBA PCR

Success needs to measured beyond the satisfaction of other Federal agencies. Many small businesses are experiencing struggles try to use the system which can impact their ability to get contract awards. Small business opinions should be of paramount importance.

Mon, Oct 29, 2012

The bounus for us would be to get rid of GSA, and our cost would deminish tremendously by over 50%. Why do we get charged double or triple by our own Goverment agencies, that is ridiculous. Get rid of this old building with asbestos still lingering in our basements and behind walls and we would not be sick so often. The reality is why do we need GSA, that is the big question.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group