Departing House takes one last shot at federal pay

Rep. Darrell Issa

The federal workforce should not get automatic pay increases when the American people as a whole are not, argues Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.)

Hours before the highly publicized vote on the fiscal cliff, the House passed another measure on Jan. 1 that would have kept federal employees’ pay frozen.  Lawmakers backed the Congressional Pay Freeze and Fiscal Responsibility Act (H.R. 6726), which would prohibit a 2013 pay adjustment for federal employees and members of Congress, as called for by President Obama in a Dec. 27 executive order. The measure passed 287 to 129.

The increases are safe for now, at least, as the Senate adjourned on Jan. 2 without taking up the measure.  The 113th Congress convenes on Jan. 3, which means new legislation would have to be introduced to override Obama's executive order.  But given  the continued efforts by several legislators to keep federal pay frozen, another attempt in 2013 is hardly out of the question. 

The pending pay raise could cost taxpayers $11 billion over the next decade, according to Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

In the debate over H.R. 6726 on Jan. 1, Issa stressed that it would not stop step increases, merit increases or many other routine ways federal employees can increase their pay.  “But it will say that, at this time, when the American people are not getting automatic cost-of-living increases, neither should the federal workforce,” he said.

However, many House Democrats opposed the measure, saying government employees have done their part in saving the government money.

“Federal workers not only have borne a disproportionate share of the cost, they’ve virtually borne the only share of the cost,” Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) said.

And for what it's worth, members of Congress have already denied themselves a cost of living adjustment for 2013. The American Taxpayer Relief Act, better known as the bill that averted the fiscal cliff and which passed Congress Jan. 1, stops any increases for the lawmakers.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Cyber. Covered.

Government Cyber Insider tracks the technologies, policies, threats and emerging solutions that shape the cybersecurity landscape.


Reader comments

Wed, Feb 20, 2013

Federal employees deserve a cost of living raise, at present with the returning veteran most of the employees woked 10-12 hours days without additional pay. There are many complaints about the veterans not getting the care they need, it will be worse as employees leave to seek employment at different institutions. It is hard to have the gifted and talent nurses and physicians, we have today but with no increase in pay to maintain current with the cost of gas and food, they will not remain. Think about it they are not under contract and can leave when ever they want.

Tue, Jan 15, 2013

This is a joke. People getting pay raises when many still have no jobs. Texas has not given across the board pay increases to state employees for six years, well before the economy tanked.

Thu, Jan 3, 2013 Tired of being Issa's Punching Bag

Issa and the GOP are not going to be satisfied until Federal Employment is so unattractive to talented job seekers, that the only people the government will be able to hire will be the people that McDonalds and WalMart rejected.

Thu, Jan 3, 2013 Very Hard working Fed Worker

Seems interesting that politicians are quite at their ready to "give" our tax money to things like cash for clunkers, bailout GM, and stuff like that. But they won't give raises to federal workers, who would in turn spend that money to help ignite the ecconomy. Instead, they have the federal workers shouldering the burden of horrible budget management by this current regime we call a presidency. An ironic concept.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group