Federal Workforce

Bill to kill federal raise passes House

Ron DeSantis

Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) introduced a bill to stop the 2013 pay raise for federal employees.

The House passed a bill Feb. 15 that would stop the 2013 statutory pay adjustment for federal employees. The measure passed 261-154, with 43 Democrats voting yes.

H.R. 273, which was introduced by Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) and has 48 cosponsors, would overturn the executive order President Barack Obama signed Dec. 27, 2012, that gives employees an across-the-board raise. It would not prevent employees from receiving bonuses, merit-based or even tenure-based pay increases or promotions.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said stopping the order could save $11 billion over 10 years. His committee approved the bill.

"Federal employees are on average compensated 16 percent more than their private-sector counterparts. In fact, during the so-called 'pay freeze' federal employee pay has gone up by $3,328 while private sector pay has gone up only $1,404," Issa said in a statement.

He added: "If President Obama does not get serious about finding spending cuts to avoid his sequestration, many federal employees will be furloughed, resulting in an actual reduction in compensation and harm to productivity."

It is the second time the House has passed such a bill in little more than a month.

The White House, House Democrats and labor unions have opposed the bill, and its passage further upset them.

"To continue to single out our federal workforce is both unfair and unwise," Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said in a statement released after the vote. Hoyer noted that under the two-year pay freeze, the federal employees have effectively made a $60 billion contribution to deficit reduction.

Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, stressed federal employees are in the third year of a pay freeze. "The contributions of the dedicated and effective men and women of the federal workforce make this a better country and improve the quality of life for all Americans," she said.

The bill would still have to clear the Senate, and White House officials have said the administration opposes the legislation.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Thu, Oct 17, 2013 Richard

Mr. DeSantis is WRONG. In my field my colleges in private industry make 15-25% more than I do and they don’t have near the bureaucracy to hamper their efforts at doing a good job.

Thu, Feb 21, 2013 Michael Hardy

Reporter Matthew Weigelt has responded to some of these comments in our new blog, The Conversation. Read the entry here.

Wed, Feb 20, 2013

In every comparison I've seen that even comes close to apples to apples Federal workers are payed less than their privat sector equivalants. Cutting federal spending may be a good idea but the way to do it is to decide what functions to cut then adjust personel accordingly. Putting Federal workers further behind the private sector just chases the talent away.

Wed, Feb 20, 2013

For 27 of my 30 years in government service, I've been laughed at by my friends and peers in the private sector because that is where the money is. Now that they have a bad year or two, they come gunning for my salary and retirement. To say I'm less that sympathetic to them for not saving their money in the good years would be an understatement. That said, however, this token raise of 0.5%? while taking away 10% of my yearly salary is beyond reason. You can defend Congress or the President all you want, but they both caused this issue together, both parties. I don't want the raise. It's a meaningless political manuever that is only intended to further divide us and give the illusion that one party hates us while the other party loves us. Pick your side, either way, the jokes on you.

Wed, Feb 20, 2013

Of Idiot, Imbecile, & Moron, which is the worst? Idiot=IQ below 20 ; Imbecile=IQ of 20-49 ; Moron=IQ of 50-69 . Idiot: DeSantis. Imbecile: Issa. Moron: all others who voted yes to this bill.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group