Feds worry about mission, personal lives under sequester

worried man finances

Federal employees worry about paying bills or possibly having to take on debt to survive the sequester. (Stock image)

Federal employees are concerned sequestration will hamper agency performance, according to a new survey, but what really worries them are the devastating personal consequences it could bring.

To assess the current the impact of looming budget cuts, the pay freeze and sequestration on the government workforce, the National Treasury Employees Union surveyed its members. More than 2,250 federal employees completed the electronic poll.

The findings hint at how reduced budgets are already affecting federal agencies: Two-thirds said they see a hiring freeze, and nearly eight in 10 said employees who leave are not being replaced. Almost half said critical work is not getting done, while another 68 percent said their agency cannot complete its work appropriately.

Cutbacks also hit on a more personal level. Because of the pay freeze, nearly 75 percent of respondents have had to cut back on necessities, while two-thirds are having trouble making ends meet. Sixty percent are sinking deeper into debt; nearly 30 percent have had to rely on loans or other help to pay their bills.

Furloughs as part of sequestration would make it difficult for 80 percent to pay their rent or mortgage, utility bills and food. Sixty percent said they would have to dip into their savings or retirement plans to pay for expenses. A furlough would be especially harmful for 19 percent whose spouses have already lost a job or suffered a pay cut.

"These are not theoretical consequences," said NTEU President Colleen M. Kelley, who called for "a balanced, common-sense" strategy to sequestration. "These are actual, serious problems that real people will face, with lasting impact on their lives."

Federal employees do also fret about the impact of the budget cuts on their agency missions, the survey also shows.

Survey repondents said consequences of an extra 5 percent cut at agencies could include:

  •  The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program may not meet the needs of potential eligible applicants.
  •  U.S. borders would be more vulnerable than ever for terrorists to enter the country.
  •  Taxpayers would not get their refunds and the government would not be able to collect on taxes owed.
  •  Destructive pests and diseases will slip into the country, wreaking economic havoc in California and the rest of the country.
  •  Food safety would become an issue, and public notice of recalls would be affected.
  •  Toxic releases will go unreported and contaminated sites will not get cleaned up. Public comments and concerns will go unaddressed in regulatory processes, and grant funding will not be available to states, local governments, businesses and organizations.

survey chart

This chart, taken from NTEU's sequestration survey, shows how the sequester is already affecting agencies.

About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

Cyber. Covered.

Government Cyber Insider tracks the technologies, policies, threats and emerging solutions that shape the cybersecurity landscape.


Reader comments

Thu, Feb 28, 2013 Michael Hardy

Is sequestration just media hype? See Camille Tuutti's response to the comment at The Conversation: http://ow.ly/i9hI1

Thu, Feb 28, 2013 DeAnne

Mike I agree with you 100%, it is unbelievable right before your eyes. I am a humble person and have faith that my time will come to catch up to 3 grades that I have long for many years now. I have seen them come and go like flies on the walls doing nothing! My only hope is that I can reap the harvest of my hard labor and struggles to be proud of my endurance as a faithful employee.

Wed, Feb 27, 2013

Talking about focusing on minutiae, the lack of knowledge, information, and awareness represent by the comments I’ve read so far is exactly the reason we’re in this mess.
“Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Wed, Feb 27, 2013

March 1st is a "political cliff", which will have its own negative consequences. The real economic cliff will be the collapse of the Bond Market. Continuing Resolutions mean continue reckless spending. Reckless Government spending has exceeded it's tax revenue and is maintained now by excessive money printing to fill in the shortfall. Excessive money printing devalues the dollar and will lead to High Inflation. At some point faith is lost in the dollar and the Bond Market implodes and the citizens lose faith in their leadership. Austerity on the other hand is also reckless, and results in citizens losing faith in their leadership. So we have 2 choices, which are both bad. I guess this is why Congress cannot decide what to do and who will get blamed, but it all falls back on decades of self-centered leadership under the influence of money.

Wed, Feb 27, 2013

We lost an employee way back in May of 2012 and other in September and still no replacements in sight. The sequester has nothing to do with filling those positions last year. Now that the sequester is just starting to kick in people are claiming that it is the source of all their problems. Obviously some of these people in the survey are either just out of touch with reality or plain dishonest.
This country has a serious debt problem and people have to learn to deal with reality - something I noticed that most life-long Fed employees do not seem to understand.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group