Policy

Big data's big hurdle: federal policy

adrift in a sea of data

Big data has tremendous potential to help agencies glean insights from a sea of information, but sometimes policy stands in the way. (Stock image)

Big data has all the promise in the world to help agencies glean otherwise impossible insights from massive repositories of data, but some believe federal policies thus far have blunted big data’s potential in the public sector.

"Policy questions are always a potential derailer," said Josh Sullivan, a data scientist and vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton.

"We’ve worked with a number of big agencies on practical pilots and nationally enterprised adoptions," Sullivan told FCW. "Inevitably, security policy, data protection policies and sharing policies were all antibodies to all the technology."

Sullivan said that some intelligence agencies have exceled out of necessity at finding innovative solutions in big data that navigate policy, developing mature big data models that combine IT efficiencies, "smart" data and cloud analytics to create a portfolio on which data-driven decisions are made.

But most other federal agencies, Sullivan said, are content to reach the point at which they’ve jumped into the cloud and virtualized some of their IT infrastructure.

They are reacting to the big data buzz with outdated, old-hat polices rather than proactively embracing potentially huge financial gains and insights through policy that outlines questions that big data can actually answer.

"Until people start saying big analytics instead of big data, I don’t know if we’ll see the government realizing all the latent patterns there for us to discover," Sullivan said. Agency executives can start framing outlines by "writing down 10 game-changing questions you cannot answer today that would substantially move the needle on your mission," he added.

Technology changes fast, said Mark Forman, former administrator for e-government and IT at the Office of Management and Budget, but said broader federal polices aren’t changing with them.

"Laws relating to privacy haven’t kept up with the changes in data as a result of social media and the Internet," said Forman, who believes decision makers will one day base major decisions on insights from structured and unstructured big data.

Forman said the Privacy Act, enacted in 1974 to keep the government from using personal citizen data for reasons not in the public’s best interest, could stand a 21st century refresh.

Some, he said, thought the Bush-era Patriot Act might be the catalyst for such a change, but the controversy over the counterterrorism measure eventually quieted.

Yet big data, and particularly the ability to collect huge bits of unstructured data, has changed how the government gathers information. What used to be a linear approach to information gathering is now a "topsy-turvy" approach where mined data can infringe on existing privacy laws.

"It’s hard to scrape off privacy-related information," Forman said. "There is a lot of research going on right now in understanding how we modify privacy laws and paperwork burden laws in a totally different era, and not just in the United States. The question is, what is the catalyst for this?"

Aubrey Vaughan, managing director of the public sector at Oversight Systems, a big data analytics software provider, said unfortunately no "silver bullet exists" to solve the policy dilemma short of a group of feds championing the effort.

"I think we are in the infancy stages of big data, a lot of agencies are being told a lot of different things about big data, and it is a buzzword," Vaughan said. "Some agencies are putting the emphasis now on analytics, and efficiencies are driving it more to the surface and creating more groundswell in the government to do more now."

About the Author

Frank Konkel is a former staff writer for FCW.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group