Oversight

How many hats can an OSDBU director wear?

Tom Leney

Tom Leney, executive director of VA's Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization.

Two House subcommittee chairmen have taken the Department of Veterans Affairs to task for not complying with small-business statutes.

VA has what Reps. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.) and Mike Coffman (R-Colo.) consider an inappropriately dual-hatted official: Tom Leney is executive director of the department's Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU), a job that also involves overseeing the VA organization that verifies companies' ability to compete for contracts.

However, in a letter to VA Secretary Eric Shinseki, Hanna and Coffman wrote that the Small Business Act requires the OSDBU director to carry out that job exclusively and not hold any other title or position.

They noted that the department is required to verify the status of small businesses owned by veterans, including those owned by service-disabled veterans, and that VA has assigned those functions to the Center for Veterans Enterprise, which falls within Leney's purview.

Although the act allows for adding duties if they are necessary, Hanna and Coffman wrote that Leney's dual responsibility "belies the inherent conflict between the advocacy role assigned to the OSDBU and the auditing function now associated with CVE."

Hanna is chairman of the Small Business Committee's Contracting and Workforce Subcommittee, and Coffman is chairman of the Veterans' Affairs Committee's Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee. At a joint hearing on March 19 to examine disparities between the VA's and the Small Business Administration's contracting programs for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses, Leney said he could perform both sets of duties because he is ultimately an advocate for veterans.

"I can do both because the act of verifying [companies] enabled 5,400 veteran-owned small businesses to participate in a program that has distributed more than $3.8 billion" in contracts, he told the subcommittees. "This is real money to real vets, and it is a program that benefits veterans.... So I personally do not have any issue with a conflict of interest because we are helping vets."

In the letter, Hanna and Coffman asked Shinseki to document how the department intends to achieve compliance with the Small Business Act. VA officials had no comment on the letter but plan to formally respond to the subcommittees.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

The Fed 100

Save the date for 28th annual Federal 100 Awards Gala.

Featured

  • computer network

    How Einstein changes the way government does business

    The Department of Commerce is revising its confidentiality agreement for statistical data survey respondents to reflect the fact that the Department of Homeland Security could see some of that data if it is captured by the Einstein system.

  • Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. Army photo by Monica King. Jan. 26, 2017.

    Mattis mulls consolidation in IT, cyber

    In a Feb. 17 memo, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told senior leadership to establish teams to look for duplication across the armed services in business operations, including in IT and cybersecurity.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DHS vague on rules for election aid, say states

    State election officials had more questions than answers after a Department of Homeland Security presentation on the designation of election systems as critical U.S. infrastructure.

  • Org Chart Stock Art - Shutterstock

    How the hiring freeze targets millennials

    The government desperately needs younger talent to replace an aging workforce, and experts say that a freeze on hiring doesn't help.

  • Shutterstock image: healthcare digital interface.

    VA moves ahead with homegrown scheduling IT

    The Department of Veterans Affairs will test an internally developed scheduling module at primary care sites nationwide to see if it's ready to service the entire agency.

  • Shutterstock images (honglouwawa & 0beron): Bitcoin image overlay replaced with a dollar sign on a hardware circuit.

    MGT Act poised for a comeback

    After missing in the last Congress, drafters of a bill to encourage cloud adoption are looking for a new plan.

Reader comments

Sat, Apr 27, 2013

Its clear that they have personnel over at the CVE, that are truly unqualified to manage, and administer the program fairly. We need individuals who understand business, and not a jealous government employee managing the program, that clearly hate to see SDVOB's become successful. The stress of the program, is wondering if they will be biased against you for some personal, or psychological reason that never has anything to do with service, or business. Court of Federal Claims, will clearly show that there is a problem, and abuse done to small SDVOB's nationally. They need to separate the responsibility, and send it back to SBA, and let the OSDBU attempt to act as an advocate then.

Thu, Mar 28, 2013 David Ready Virginia Beach, VA

You cannot properly audit or conduct compliance reviews to assure the qualification and proper documentation of a small, Veteran-Owned business and be an Advocate for the business at the same time. It is an inherent conflict of purpose and guarantees that the audit and oversight will be probably be compromised due to the advocacy role generating personal interaction that goes beyond technical compliance issues. A good advocate must learn the objectives, weaknesses and strengths of the client to provide effective guidance and support. The combining of roles is not advisable for proper program management.

Thu, Mar 28, 2013

At Public Forums in the past the government personnel at the VA CVE have stated that they are not "advocates" for Veterans. Their job is to keep veterans out of the Veterans First and SDVOSB Programs.

Thu, Mar 28, 2013 Olde Sarge DC

Nothing more than Tea Party congress people looking for feather in their cap for ferriting out bureaucratic evil at the VA. The small business ombudsman for the VA is precisely who should be vetting and qualifying as many vetran owned small businesses as possible to compete for VA small business contracts. I wonder which congress critter's constituent small businesse lost VA contracts to vetran owned small businesses.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group