China pushes back against new IT sourcing rules

room of computers

China is unhappy with new provisions in U.S. law that put new restrictions on four federal agencies' ability to acquire IT equipment from the nation.

The law sends the wrong signal, and will affect trade and business relations between Chinese IT companies and their American partners, said a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce, as quoted in state-run news outlet Xinhua.

The new rules, which apply to NASA, the Commerce and Justice departments and the National Science Foundation, were signed into law on March 28, as a small provision in the continuing resolution to keep the U.S. government open through the current fiscal year.

It's not clear what China could do to protest the move. Stewart Baker, a national security lawyer and former senior official in the Department of Homeland Security noted on the legal blog the Volokh Conspiracy, that China could try to protest the move with the World Trade Organization. Baker wrote that any case China tries to make on these grounds could be weakened by China's status as an observer and not a signatory to the WTO's government procurement agreement, and because the U.S. rules apply to "purchase from Chinese-government-influenced entities, no matter where these entities manufacture their products."

So far, the affected agencies haven't disclosed how they plan to cope with the changes in IT acquisition.

About the Author

Adam Mazmanian is executive editor of FCW.

Before joining the editing team, Mazmanian was an FCW staff writer covering Congress, government-wide technology policy, health IT and the Department of Veterans Affairs. Prior to joining FCW, Mr. Mazmanian was technology correspondent for National Journal and served in a variety of editorial at B2B news service SmartBrief. Mazmanian started his career as an arts reporter and critic, and has contributed reviews and articles to the Washington Post, the Washington City Paper, Newsday, Architect magazine, and other publications. He was an editorial assistant and staff writer at the now-defunct New York Press and arts editor at the online network in the 1990s, and was a weekly contributor of music and film reviews to the Washington Times from 2007 to 2014.

Click here for previous articles by Mazmanian. Connect with him on Twitter at @thisismaz.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Tue, Apr 2, 2013 Ray

Hmm...They do not want to sign up to playing in the sandbox (according to the article) yet they want to be treated the same as those who have. They also have a history of underhanded computer espionage, and they are trying to say it is unfair that the rules are (potentially) blocking them from doing that?

It is unfair, but if you have a reputation, you have to expect people to not want to get burned.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group