Workforce Management

Same-sex spouses of federal employees eligible for benefits

same-sex marriage

Federal employees in legal same-sex marriages will be able to extend insurance benefits, pensions and flexible spending accounts to their spouses and children of spouses as a result of the Supreme Court decision overturning the Defense of Marriage Act.

Federal employees can immediately apply to extend health, life, dental, vision, and long-term care insurance to their same-sex spouses, according to a memo from Elaine Kaplan, acting director of the Office of Personnel Management, to agency heads dated June 28. The window to enroll same-sex spouses for benefits extends to August 26, sixty days from the date of the Supreme Court decision. Retirees have until June 26, 2015, to inform OPM of any change to retirement benefits to provide for a surviving spouse.

Federal employees may have to use paper forms to elect benefits, while online enrollment systems are updated, according to the memo.

The short memo does not dig into many of the myriad jurisdictional questions posed by this extension of benefits. For instance, it's not entirely clear how the decision applies to federal employees who were married in a state where same-sex marriage is recognized, but now reside in a state that does not. The language in the memo, however, suggests an expansive interpretation. It says that OPM will now "be able to extend benefits to federal employees and annuitants who have legally married a spouse of the same sex."

There are about 34,000 federal employees in legally recognized same-sex relationships, including marriages, domestic partnerships, and civil unions, according to a February report of the Congressional Research Service.

About the Author

Adam Mazmanian is executive editor of FCW.

Before joining the editing team, Mazmanian was an FCW staff writer covering Congress, government-wide technology policy, health IT and the Department of Veterans Affairs. Prior to joining FCW, Mr. Mazmanian was technology correspondent for National Journal and served in a variety of editorial at B2B news service SmartBrief. Mazmanian started his career as an arts reporter and critic, and has contributed reviews and articles to the Washington Post, the Washington City Paper, Newsday, Architect magazine, and other publications. He was an editorial assistant and staff writer at the now-defunct New York Press and arts editor at the About.com online network in the 1990s, and was a weekly contributor of music and film reviews to the Washington Times from 2007 to 2014.

Click here for previous articles by Mazmanian. Connect with him on Twitter at @thisismaz.


FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1996, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

  • Shutterstock image.

    Merged IT modernization bill punts on funding

    A House panel approved a new IT modernization bill that appears poised to pass, but key funding questions are left for appropriators.

  • General Frost

    Army wants cyber capability everywhere

    The Army's cyber director said cyber, electronic warfare and information operations must be integrated into warfighters' doctrine and training.

  • Rising Star 2013

    Meet the 2016 Rising Stars

    FCW honors 30 early-career leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Tue, Aug 20, 2013

Not that it's a bad thing, but I've never seen something move so fast as the enactment of this HR process. I mean it seems like the day after the court ruled on it, the President made sure the paint was dry on the canvas. Like I said, I have no problem with it, but I thought it odd that we almost stopped the governement to make sure this was locked-in and implemented. You can tell this is one the President wanted and wanted badly.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group