Critical Read

Report tracks 'tail spend'

Long Tail report cover

What: A new report from the IBM Center for the Business of Government provides what it calls the first quantitative analysis of the federal government’s mostly overlooked "tail spend," which drains billions of dollars in a jumble of ill-defined products and services.

Why: Tail-spend procurement refers to buying outside an organization’s core spending and supplier groups and covers miscellaneous expenditure categories that aren’t managed as part of an organization’s core operations. Those expenditures eat up billions of federal dollars without much notice, according to author David Wyld, C.E. Laborde Professor of Management at Southeastern Louisiana University, director of the College of Business' Strategic e-Commerce/e-Government Initiative and founding editor of the International Journal of Managing Information Technology.

Wyld argues that by more aggressively managing the tail of government spending, agencies could save big money. Based on his analysis of agency-reported spending in the Federal Procurement Data System, Wyld predicts the government could save $113 billion to $226 billion, while the Defense Department could save $64 billion to $128 billion.

According to Wyld, tail spending encompasses several categories, including misclassified and fragmented spending outside existing contracts, maverick spending outside procurement guidelines, and unusual spending on one-time high-value items, low-priced but high-frequency items and low-priced, low-value items.

However, efforts to shorten the spending tail face obstacles such as poor data visibility, lack of effective spending controls, misperceptions about the potential savings and a general lack of interest, Wyld said.

Verbatim: "With today’s renewed emphasis on strategic sourcing in the private and public sectors alike, the best way to leverage an organization’s purchasing power may be to bring a new focus on procurements made at the edge of the supply chain, both in terms of what is being bought and with whom the transactions are made."

Download the full report: businessofgovernment.org

About the Author

Mark Rockwell is a staff writer at FCW.

Before joining FCW, Rockwell was Washington correspondent for Government Security News, where he covered all aspects of homeland security from IT to detection dogs and border security. Over the last 25 years in Washington as a reporter, editor and correspondent, he has covered an increasingly wide array of high-tech issues for publications like Communications Week, Internet Week, Fiber Optics News, tele.com magazine and Wireless Week.

Rockwell received a Jesse H. Neal Award for his work covering telecommunications issues, and is a graduate of James Madison University.

Click here for previous articles by Rockwell. Contact him at mrockwell@fcw.com or follow him on Twitter at @MRockwell4.


The Fed 100

Save the date for 28th annual Federal 100 Awards Gala.

Featured

  • Social network, census

    5 predictions for federal IT in 2017

    As the Trump team takes control, here's what the tech community can expect.

  • Rep. Gerald Connolly

    Connolly warns on workforce changes

    The ranking member of the House Oversight Committee's Government Operations panel warns that Congress will look to legislate changes to the federal workforce.

  • President Donald J. Trump delivers his inaugural address

    How will Trump lead on tech?

    The businessman turned reality star turned U.S. president clearly has mastered Twitter, but what will his administration mean for broader technology issues?

  • Login.gov moving ahead

    The bid to establish a single login for accessing government services is moving again on the last full day of the Obama presidency.

  • Shutterstock image (by Jirsak): customer care, relationship management, and leadership concept.

    Obama wraps up security clearance reforms

    In a last-minute executive order, President Obama institutes structural reforms to the security clearance process designed to create a more unified system across government agencies.

  • Shutterstock image: breached lock.

    What cyber can learn from counterterrorism

    The U.S. has to look at its experience in developing post-9/11 counterterrorism policies to inform efforts to formalize cybersecurity policies, says a senior official.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group